Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 10:48 AM Feb 2013

Obama and Graham on the same bloody page. [View all]

"Becoming the first elected government official to publicly state an estimated number of "innocent people" killed in US drone attacks overseas, Sen. Lindsey Graham told a local crowd in his home state of South Carolina that "We've killed 4,700."

Speaking to a group of Rotarians at a forum in Easley, South Carolina, Graham responded to question about drones by saying, "Sometimes you hit innocent people, and I hate that, but we're at war, and we've taken out some very senior members of Al-Qaeda."

His remarks, reported by the local Easley Patch, included a defense of the use of drones despite their propensity to kill innocent bystanders, including women and children.

“I didn't want him to have a trial,” Graham stated, referring to a US citizen, Anwar Al-Awlaki, who was assassinated in Yemen by a missile from a US drone in 2011.
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/02/21-0

You should know that you're doing something wrong when Graham agrees with you. Oh, and we finally got an admission from a government official about the total number of innocents killed, 4,700. What a sad statement that is. I guess Obama didn't want Al-Awlaki, or his son to have a trial either, since he is the one who ordered the attack. Two parties, same blood soaked policy. Yep, that's change you had better believe in, because if you don't. . .

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yes, I am on the same page as President Obama. graham4anything Feb 2013 #1
Well, I'm assuming that you have the capability to read the first sentence of the post MadHound Feb 2013 #2
but would others? graham4anything Feb 2013 #3
You know, just deal with it, I don't change my posts at your request. MadHound Feb 2013 #6
No, I am assuming the terrorists themselves would do damage in the other countries graham4anything Feb 2013 #11
You know what they say about ass u me. MadHound Feb 2013 #18
The Madrid train bombings, the 7/11 plot, Mumbai? Those were because of the President? nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #22
No, MadHound Feb 2013 #24
And you wouldn't have supported a drone strike of Tora Bora in November of 2001? nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #25
I'm not on the same page. onyourleft Feb 2013 #4
Results of Jury Service WilliamPitt Feb 2013 #5
Thanks Will, I do appreciate it immensely. MadHound Feb 2013 #8
Cheers. WilliamPitt Feb 2013 #10
"US Senator: I Support Drone Program That Has Killed 4,700 'Innocent People'" ProSense Feb 2013 #7
You better believe it. n/t JTFrog Feb 2013 #9
That's such a cute, substanceless piece of snark, MadHound Feb 2013 #16
How does one confuse Lindsey Graham and Barack Obama? The Rasmussen poll you msanthrope Feb 2013 #19
Both Obama and Graham support drone strikes, even if they are killing thousands of innocents, MadHound Feb 2013 #21
So are they the same? nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #23
As I stated before, they both support drone strikes. MadHound Feb 2013 #32
As I asked upthread would you have supported a drone strike at Tora Bora? nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #35
Yes, you did, very good, your memory is sharp today. MadHound Feb 2013 #36
I addressed it alright. JTFrog Feb 2013 #34
Where do you get "4700 innocent people" from? Recursion Feb 2013 #12
From the article, MadHound Feb 2013 #15
Just for accuracy's sake the figure is total number of people killed. Commondreams repackaged pinto Feb 2013 #29
Actually I think Graham's number is the closest to accurate that we can get at this point MadHound Feb 2013 #30
Again, just for accuracy's sake. re: Stanford/NYU report - pinto Feb 2013 #37
That's a round, rough figure. This being a thursday kenny blankenship Feb 2013 #13
So we were all for the Nuremberg trials choie Feb 2013 #14
Custodial Nazi's, yes. Before surrender, we didn't give them a trial, nor did we have to. msanthrope Feb 2013 #17
No doubt, in this bastion of laws and justice, those who killed the innocents will stand trial. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2013 #20
Oh look, it's this thread again...nt SidDithers Feb 2013 #26
You Better Believe It! nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #28
ooh, he "hates that". well, then i guess all's well, so long as he expresses the perfunctory HiPointDem Feb 2013 #27
Maybe the North Koreans would get him while he's visiting Baltimore...nt SidDithers Feb 2013 #31
What if the Russians took out Bill Gates, Arne Duncan msanthrope Feb 2013 #38
So, we've killed 4700 and SOME of them actually WERE bad guys. HereSince1628 Feb 2013 #33
I see that most of the usual suspects showed up to misconstrue, misinterpret, Egalitarian Thug Feb 2013 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama and Graham on the s...