Mass Media ignoring 'RFK Believed in Conspiracy' shows corrupt nature of America's Press

[William Seger]

248. Ah, the "Octafish Gambit"

When challenged about specific assertions, just make some more and link to articles as if they are proof. "Proof by exhaustion" -- of the reader.

I assume this tangent means you accept my analysis that conspiracists need to declare that the photo is fake, despite having no reason other than it tells a different story than the one they want to sell. Even though it does show that the wound was at the "base of the neck," obviously only an "FBI stooge" would say so. Now we can move on to declaring that if Ford reached a different conclusion than you, he must have been obstructing justice and part of the conspiracy -- facts be damned, since we can just dismiss those when we're dealing with conspiracies.

But that article (hidden away in the Washington Post ) proves no such thing. Once again, innuendo is the best you can do. On and on and on, for fifty years now: The things you claim that appear to be true do not prove a conspiracy, and the things you claim that would prove a conspiracy don't appear to be true.

But who knows what tomorrow will bring.. As I've said before, if you could actually prove your assertions, you won't have to worry about what William Seger believes.