Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: President Obama Richly Deserves to Be Dumped [View all]bertman
(11,287 posts)190. Agree 100%. REC. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
255 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What an indictment you just made of the broken system, unintentionally I'm sure, we live under.
sabrina 1
Dec 2011
#18
Yes. With the Citizen's United decision in place, only candidates sanctioned by the 1%
Zorra
Dec 2011
#122
Very true, judging from what I saw from inside the Kucinich campaign in 2004
Lydia Leftcoast
Dec 2011
#150
Unintentionally, you know, you just described Obama's 2008 presidential platform...
RandomKoolzip
Dec 2011
#240
when someone says that it's a strong clue that they don't know enough about individual congress
cali
Dec 2011
#127
DK is fine as an obscure House member - he is just not presidential material.
banned from Kos
Dec 2011
#157
He IS presidential material and was the most popular candidate for that office
sabrina 1
Dec 2011
#161
Well, I don't want to argue but you wrote your post with passion and conviction.
banned from Kos
Dec 2011
#179
Al Gore is Mr. DLC himself. Remember its the Clinton machine that spawned the "Blue Dogs".
Erose999
Dec 2011
#74
Those are viable choices. And electable if there was a chance of them running.
GoneOffShore
Dec 2011
#148
well, of course there's no chance- every single pol you mentioned supports Obama , even Bernie.
Capn Sunshine
Dec 2011
#214
Obama has succeeded in killing a lot more of our dedicated enemies than Bush did.
olegramps
Dec 2011
#250
the Democratic Party isn't going to nominate anyone outside of the establishment, actually
paulk
Dec 2011
#46
You are eliding so much history with the statement that "after this challenge
coalition_unwilling
Dec 2011
#28
You allege that, because McCarthy mounted his challenge to LBJ, we ended up
coalition_unwilling
Dec 2011
#44
Since you're fond of referencing Wikipedia, I'd like to point you to another Wikipedia article:
coalition_unwilling
Dec 2011
#65
Bingo. ....almost every credible poltiical scientist now argues that Humphrey would have defeated
MADem
Dec 2011
#98
Under this reasoning, if Gingrich had a "(D)" after his name, would you support him?
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2011
#71
Obama is doing a damn fine job of being a President GinGrinch himself. NDAA, the continuing of
Erose999
Dec 2011
#77
LBJ lost the presidency by pushing civil rights legislation through congress, ending the nearly 40
Warren Stupidity
Dec 2011
#153
It's all about what John R MacArthur wants to happen. Hidden deep in his mind.
LiberalFighter
Dec 2011
#246
I'm kinda unhappy with Obama & the current batch of Dems. I've made no secret of it.
Jackpine Radical
Dec 2011
#10
I guess I'm looking outside "politics as usual" to find my agents of change.
Jackpine Radical
Dec 2011
#91
Wake up people ...they don't give a fuck about us. Poor people don't finance political campaigns.
L0oniX
Dec 2011
#12
If all poor people voted it would be a slam dunk for the dems every four years and we would still
demosincebirth
Dec 2011
#16
No, but the landscape is the same - unpopular U.S. military offenses, mass civil uprisings ...
T S Justly
Dec 2011
#38
Humphrey could have been elected if he would have chosen to oppose the war, or say that he did.
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2011
#75
Humphry was a good man, but he would not take a public position contrary to the war hawks.
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2011
#114
No, thanks. Name a challenger and I'll work even harder to support President Obama.
NYC Liberal
Dec 2011
#41
I'm not speaking for anyone else; only for me. I haven't said "Do you want President Newt."
NYC Liberal
Dec 2011
#103
This seems to be different he has the "overwhelming support of the liberal base of the party"
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2011
#115
right or wrong, good or bad - there is not even a .00001% chance that it is going to happen
Douglas Carpenter
Dec 2011
#42
If I could recommend a reply, it would be this one. I will wish with you.
LiberalAndProud
Dec 2011
#110
Funny--When someone asked me why I thought O had shown no interest in taking on the MIC,
Jackpine Radical
Dec 2011
#255
Don't Compare Obama To The Almighty. Compare Him To The Alternative.
DemocratSinceBirth
Dec 2011
#51
You Do Know The Next President Will Be Barack Obama Or His Republican Opponent
DemocratSinceBirth
Dec 2011
#248
He does, but there is no alternative. The only person who can beat him isn't interested.
Tatiana
Dec 2011
#69
I dunno about the primary challenge, but Obama does remind me of Carter in some ways.
bemildred
Dec 2011
#79
Anyone who was voting against the war wouldn't, and didn't, vote for Nixon or Humphrey.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Dec 2011
#169
good one. "no one except Fox News promised he would be a liberal dream once in office"
certainot
Dec 2011
#186
According to Turley the ONLY pro-civil liberties candidate is the LIBERTARIAN Ron Paul!
alp227
Dec 2011
#126
While replacing obama may or may not be a good idea with a more liberal democratic
cstanleytech
Dec 2011
#130
Its not that Obama has refused solutions because he has its that the republicans stonewall him and
cstanleytech
Dec 2011
#158
Yup they controlled them but not enough to totally block the republicans from
cstanleytech
Dec 2011
#172
Eugene McCarthy's protege and heir: Darcy Richardson 2012- The only game in town to dump Obama
Hart2008
Dec 2011
#168
The Progressive Democrat running for President of the United States of America! NT
Hart2008
Dec 2011
#215
"i can't believe all the recs, must be a lot of folks not paying attention.... or trolls..."
Number23
Dec 2011
#202
Keep in mind that over 70% of Americans thought Saddam was behind 9/11 at one point
Cali_Democrat
Dec 2011
#226
cali dem is right- there's a difference - the US is aggressively misinformed starting with a radio
certainot
Dec 2011
#232
Go for it...Primary this President...or let him lose for lack of support...
Ivywoods55
Dec 2011
#199
My first thought on reading article was remembering that McCarthy didn't get nominated...
Mimosa
Dec 2011
#234
McCarthy was a perennial joke like Nader. This is fringe nonsense bullshit. Find the planet.
RBInMaine
Dec 2011
#238