General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: New Pope Elected: Centuries Of Make-Believe (Religion) Reaffirmed For The Masses [View all]sarisataka
(21,925 posts)to protect you more than me.
I have met many people who worship a variety of gods, God, powers, nothing. I suspect none of us are entirely correct so it is good to stay on speaking terms with whatever awaits us. If someone wants to compare beliefs, I am fine with that. You may accept what I believe, dismiss it or anything in between. I have never had an issue with matching faith and science; after all if there is an omnipotent God who can create the universe in seven days, how can I say He does not have the power to create beings which will evolve and change over time. For that matter, what is time to a being that is omnipotent and eternal?
No one is threatening me with religious persecution (beyond vehemently stating their beliefs- I have thick skin). The fundies (I have one in the family) would be more than happy to pass anti-godlessness laws. "Under God" could appear in many more places without the protection the 1A provides. While on paper their beliefs and mine may be similar, I have the right to think and say they are proselytizing hypocrites who can quote the bible without understanding a word of it. While not 'establishing' a preferred religion they would happily bring a 'god' into schools and government that neither you nor I would approve of.
The protection of religion is also a protection of non-religion. People should have the maximum freedom to believe in God, Allah, Thor, the goddess, kami, Santa Claus, socially responsible Republicans or nothing at all.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):