Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
31. Rather than ignore the problem, Bernie Sanders took them on...
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 11:43 PM
Mar 2013

...grabbing 'em by the nose, and kicking them in the pants.



The Fed Audit

The first top-to-bottom audit of the Federal Reserve uncovered eye-popping new details about how the U.S. provided a whopping $16 trillion in secret loans to bail out American and foreign banks and businesses during the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. An amendment by Sen. Bernie Sanders to the Wall Street reform law passed one year ago this week directed the Government Accountability Office to conduct the study. "As a result of this audit, we now know that the Federal Reserve provided more than $16 trillion in total financial assistance to some of the largest financial institutions and corporations in the United States and throughout the world," said Sanders. "This is a clear case of socialism for the rich and rugged, you're-on-your-own individualism for everyone else."

Among the investigation's key findings is that the Fed unilaterally provided trillions of dollars in financial assistance to foreign banks and corporations from South Korea to Scotland, according to the GAO report. "No agency of the United States government should be allowed to bailout a foreign bank or corporation without the direct approval of Congress and the president," Sanders said.

The non-partisan, investigative arm of Congress also determined that the Fed lacks a comprehensive system to deal with conflicts of interest, despite the serious potential for abuse.  In fact, according to the report, the Fed provided conflict of interest waivers to employees and private contractors so they could keep investments in the same financial institutions and corporations that were given emergency loans.

For example, the CEO of JP Morgan Chase served on the New York Fed's board of directors at the same time that his bank received more than $390 billion in financial assistance from the Fed.  Moreover, JP Morgan Chase served as one of the clearing banks for the Fed's emergency lending programs.

In another disturbing finding, the GAO said that on Sept. 19, 2008, William Dudley, who is now the New York Fed president, was granted a waiver to let him keep investments in AIG and General Electric at the same time AIG and GE were given bailout funds.  One reason the Fed did not make Dudley sell his holdings, according to the audit, was that it might have created the appearance of a conflict of interest.
To Sanders, the conclusion is simple. "No one who works for a firm receiving direct financial assistance from the Fed should be allowed to sit on the Fed's board of directors or be employed by the Fed," he said.

The investigation also revealed that the Fed outsourced most of its emergency lending programs to private contractors, many of which also were recipients of extremely low-interest and then-secret loans.

The Fed outsourced virtually all of the operations of their emergency lending programs to private contractors like JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo.  The same firms also received trillions of dollars in Fed loans at near-zero interest rates. Altogether some two-thirds of the contracts that the Fed awarded to manage its emergency lending programs were no-bid contracts. Morgan Stanley was given the largest no-bid contract worth $108.4 million to help manage the Fed bailout of AIG.

A more detailed GAO investigation into potential conflicts of interest at the Fed is due on Oct. 18, but Sanders said one thing already is abundantly clear. "The Federal Reserve must be reformed to serve the needs of working families, not just CEOs on Wall Street."

CONTINUED...

http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=9e2a4ea8-6e73-4be2-a753-62060dcbb3c3



Bernie found out the government's been lying to us. There's plenty of money around.

Did you see that in your newspaper?

BTW: How did you know know I never get off the Barcalounger? We're so poor, if'n I were to get off'n it, the repo man'd take it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why isn't America doing so, LWolf Mar 2013 #1
Well. For one thing, the tee vee never seems to bring it up. Octafish Mar 2013 #4
I'll get that done before Monday. LWolf Mar 2013 #9
MSNBC hosts talk about wealth disparity often. bluestate10 Mar 2013 #13
Those are very unfair unsupported broad-brush accusations against 98% of the population Dragonfli Mar 2013 #27
Yeah, why not ...... oldhippie Mar 2013 #2
Really don't know. I do wish he really were a groovy socialist like Hugo C. Octafish Mar 2013 #7
Maybe because Obama believes in austerity DJ13 Mar 2013 #3
That is the logical conclusion. And to think we live in such a wealthy country. Octafish Mar 2013 #11
Excellent link! DJ13 Mar 2013 #12
... SammyWinstonJack Mar 2013 #26
His belief? How's his old neighborhood doing? The one in which he was a community organizer. AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #29
If Obama really wanted to do progressive stuff, he'd do what Reagan always did when he wanted Lydia Leftcoast Mar 2013 #5
That Pruneface "Red Ink Ronnie" got us into this fine mess. Octafish Mar 2013 #15
Why do we cling to the fantasy woo me with science Mar 2013 #6
I keep hoping things will change. Octafish Mar 2013 #19
Didn't you hear them begging him to stop attacking them? malaise Mar 2013 #8
I remember that movie DJ13 Mar 2013 #14
He chewed the fat with the GOP ''leadership'' over lobster. Octafish Mar 2013 #24
Because gerrymandering would make that a useless exercise. bluestate10 Mar 2013 #10
It's going exactly as planned... 4 t 4 Mar 2013 #23
Not sure about Pres. Obama, but I think in the minds of sane Americans, he should.... Tarheel_Dem Mar 2013 #16
Rather than ignore the problem, Bernie Sanders took them on... Octafish Mar 2013 #31
Good for Bernie. He was elected as a Socialist Independent in VT. MLK wasn't a rich man.... Tarheel_Dem Mar 2013 #33
Does property mean that much to you? Octafish Mar 2013 #35
That would just clutter up the message: limpyhobbler Mar 2013 #17
That really is some message. Octafish Mar 2013 #36
another pic of bush green for victory Mar 2013 #18
Three peas in a pod. forestpath Mar 2013 #21
The Fifth Pea stood apart. Octafish Mar 2013 #25
I don't think he wants taxes raised on the rich. He just uses that as a sop forestpath Mar 2013 #20
Perfectly balanced. Octafish Mar 2013 #34
My rep is a Rep MyshkinCommaPrince Mar 2013 #22
That IS sad -- on every count. Octafish Mar 2013 #38
Thank you! MyshkinCommaPrince Mar 2013 #47
So is this a rhetorical question? Here's a sample of my OFA emails encouraging me to call: freshwest Mar 2013 #28
Thank you for the heads-up, Freshwest. The issues you mention are most important causes. Octafish Mar 2013 #39
Thanks. And Obama is asking for support. My Inbox has been full since the election. The budget: freshwest Mar 2013 #46
Why haven't Americans done this on their own treestar Mar 2013 #30
You are correct, treestar. My point is that as leader of the nation, he has a 'Bully Pulpit'... Octafish Mar 2013 #40
How naive. theaocp Mar 2013 #41
How profound. Octafish Mar 2013 #45
K & R !!! WillyT Mar 2013 #32
It's a regular Who's Who... Octafish Mar 2013 #37
Maybe he wants all of the Republican hostage-taking in a single pile. gulliver Mar 2013 #42
Why isn't DU asking people to call their reps and demand the CPC Back To Work budget is adopted? muriel_volestrangler Mar 2013 #43
Why? 99Forever Mar 2013 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why doesn't President Oba...»Reply #31