Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GeoWilliam750

(2,555 posts)
4. We have beaten so many killers
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 06:45 AM
Mar 2013

So many diseases, infections, starvation, heart disease, cancer, and so many other things. It is so very much harder to die than it once was - prolonging life has become so technologically easy, and profitable too.

We now live until we destroy that which we worked so hard to create, and that which we love so much.

Ours is the first generation that has had to think really hard about how much care to give our aging parents, and whether another five years in a nursing home bed is a good thing or the ultimate cruelty.

However, the moral dilemma is whether allowing some one to die is the same as killing them. Whether allowing some one to live in suffering is the same as torturing them.

I do not presume to have the answer, but having had a number of family in elder care, there is no way I could serve on a jury, and punish a man for easing the pain of - to him - the most beloved person in the world, in the only way left - to him.

I can also understand that the state must prosecute, or set a terrifying precedent.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Arizona man, 86, sentence...»Reply #4