Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It Can Happen Here: The Confiscation Scheme Planned For U.S. And U.K. Depositors [View all]bhikkhu
(10,785 posts)68. I have to say, the "Cyprus Solution" seemed pretty equitable to me
Given a failed economy, they opted to take a percentage of the deposits of the wealthy to save the system as a whole. That impoverishes no one, takes nothing from the poor, and takes only from the wealthy what the wealthy could afford (or could manage to afford, given the amounts - perhaps a little downscaling if one had large expenses from multiple holdings).
In any case, the two largest effects are - income inequality is improved, and a failed economy is put closer to balance.
Even "taking" part isn't exactly that, as cash was translated to bank shares. Which would mean that a large depositor now has a certain interest in the success of the economy in general, which can't be said of many wealthy here.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

It Can Happen Here: The Confiscation Scheme Planned For U.S. And U.K. Depositors [View all]
dixiegrrrrl
Mar 2013
OP
A piece of paper will prevent the banksters from doing whatever they want when they want?
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#16
"paper describes a plan" -- You're missing the point that the paper doesn't mean anything.
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#19
Under US law, if a bank is insolvent, it is either taken over by another bank
amandabeech
Mar 2013
#59
The fund was very low after the rash of bank failures in the wake of the Great Recession.
amandabeech
Mar 2013
#76
Avoid all of this by putting your money in a brokerage account such as Charles Schwab.
xtraxritical
Mar 2013
#18
They're not a "bank" and are subject to SEC rules. Also, unlike banks they have a fiduciary
xtraxritical
Mar 2013
#28
Aren't there court opinions which held that banks have had fiduciary responsibilities?
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#44
There are LAWS which say the FDIC is supposed to step in BEFORE a bank gets into deep trouble
dixiegrrrrl
Mar 2013
#67
Note that in Cyprus, those insured depositors WERE GOING TO lose their funds.
dixiegrrrrl
Mar 2013
#73
The very same banksters who crashed the world economy remain at their desks, don’t they?
ms.smiler
Mar 2013
#22
Oh, very good. That will make it easier for anyone who is truly interested.
dixiegrrrrl
Mar 2013
#24
Sorry, facts are facts, and its not only true, but has a lot of news citations.
dixiegrrrrl
Mar 2013
#83
I've been converting a portion of my liquid savings to physical silver and gold
madville
Mar 2013
#87