Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
7. Not really, no
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 05:35 PM
Apr 2013

"working class" has a pretty clear meaning and is well-understood, sociologically (the fact that Americans specifically don't understand it because the American working class think they beling to the bourgeoisie is something else; it doesn't mean that it's a term devoid of meaning); socialism is also well-understood (as being a more or less mixed economy with some state or collective ownership of the means of production, see nationalised industry in postwar Europe for instance); and the proletariat are the broad class of wage-workers who have no ownership of the means of production and whose only tradeable resource in the marketplace is their labour (which is, mostly, the broadest part of the so-called American "middle class&quot .

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is "Chained CPI" a 50 yea...»Reply #7