Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)

11. it doesn't mean "middle of the income distribution", though.

Reply to starroute (Reply #10)

Sat Apr 6, 2013, 08:51 PM

Apr 2013

And "clearly poor" people are not "working class", they're the underclass (who are, yes, of a lower socioeconomic class than the working class). This seems to me to represent a fundamentally confused understanding of socioeconomics.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is "Chained CPI" a 50 year plan to put the former American middle class in chains? [View all] Faryn Balyncd Apr 2013 OP

seems like it. nt limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #1

It would be nice if people could use words in a way that had any meaning Spider Jerusalem Apr 2013 #2

I'm afraid I think the juxtaposition of post title and content is unfortunate... Donald Ian Rankin Apr 2013 #5

Not really, no Spider Jerusalem Apr 2013 #7

The term did mean something in the 1950s and 60s starroute Apr 2013 #6

Nope. Spider Jerusalem Apr 2013 #8

I understand why you're saying that -- but there are problems either way starroute Apr 2013 #10

it doesn't mean "middle of the income distribution", though. Spider Jerusalem Apr 2013 #11

I've gotten into some rhetorical jams on DU while discussing upper middle/middle class/working class KittyWampus Apr 2013 #9

Bingo! Eddie Haskell Apr 2013 #3

Are they chaining Congressional retirees? Downwinder Apr 2013 #4