Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Ganja Ninja

(15,953 posts)

2. That's the part about nukes the NK leadership doesn't get.

Reply to caraher (Original post)

Mon Apr 15, 2013, 01:23 PM

Apr 2013

It's not like lobbing a few artillery shells at an island. You shoot off even one nuke and you go right to the top the the military's to do list. The status quo is no longer tolerable and the problem will get attended to until it's settled one way or another.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Response to bungled NK attack? [View all] caraher Apr 2013 OP

I don't think anyone is really "promoting" the threat. I don't think Obama or Congress or the TwilightGardener Apr 2013 #1

That's the part about nukes the NK leadership doesn't get. Ganja Ninja Apr 2013 #2

Add to this complexity the fact that we don't wnat to reveal the true capabilities of the ABM system leveymg Apr 2013 #3

If they launch at us, the military will respond I think, even if they miss Marrah_G Apr 2013 #4

Who is rooting this threat? nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #5

I'll admit I'm confused by the whole thing caraher Apr 2013 #6