General Discussion

Orsino

(37,428 posts)

56. Not according to the Constitution. n/t

Reply to graham4anything (Reply #52)

Mon Apr 29, 2013, 10:51 AM

Apr 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

58 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

G. W. Bush--Innocent of the Theft of the Presidency? [View all] Cliff Arnebeck Apr 2013 OP

Ralph Nader/NH was compicit in the theft of the 2000 election, is my answer, choice not there. graham4anything Apr 2013 #1

Hilarious! Octafish Apr 2013 #5

You nailed that one correctly. FarPoint Apr 2013 #13

No, Bush, the GOP in Florida and the Supreme Court stole the 2000 election. One of the 99 Apr 2013 #7

So running for president in the US is illegal? What was illegal about Ralph Nader's run sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #8

Without NH's 4 going for Bush, Gore was seated. It is a plain fact. 267 plus 4=271 graham4anything Apr 2013 #12

We are talking about the illegal theft of an election. You did not answer the question. The sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #18

Not true. IF it was a pre-planned conspiracy and not a CT, then yes, Nader part of it graham4anything Apr 2013 #20

Democrats voted for Thomas. So what's your point? The USSC committed a crime. sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #21

Russ Feingold voted for John Roberts graham4anything Apr 2013 #28

You're either with the DLC... dreamnightwind Apr 2013 #34

Lol, so did Joe Biden. Again, what is your point other than avoiding the question I asked sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #35

And without Gore, Nader would have been seated. n/t Orsino Apr 2013 #49

How? Where would the 270 have come from? graham4anything Apr 2013 #50

That was more or less my point. Orsino Apr 2013 #51

No, it is nothing the same. There should only be 2 running in the general. graham4anything Apr 2013 #52

Not according to the Constitution. n/t Orsino Apr 2013 #56

Then don't complain about anything W ever did. According to it, W won. graham4anything Apr 2013 #57

My takeaway here is that third-party candidates shouldn't be allowed? Orsino Apr 2013 #58

"Bushfamily was compicit in the democratic party not being seated in the elections of Jenoch Apr 2013 #9

Gish Gallop - it's g4a's tactic of choice blm Apr 2013 #17

Nailed it. EOTE Apr 2013 #22

41,41,41,41,41,41,41. graham4anything Apr 2013 #23

Good to know. Jenoch Apr 2013 #26

I blame Gore significantly more than I blame Nader for Gore's loss. ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #31

Complicit? Coyotl Apr 2013 #2

W. was always a stooge. Always. Orsino Apr 2013 #44

More like a very willing tool Coyotl Apr 2013 #47

Yes. We blew trillions and lost hundreds of thousands of people... Orsino Apr 2013 #48

He stole it and was aided and abetted by his brother and the Florida GOP and various stevenleser Apr 2013 #3

Exactly! FarPoint Apr 2013 #14

Here's the "Fahrenheit 9-11" scene with Dubya & Jeb sitting in a plane guaranteeing the interviewer pacalo Apr 2013 #19

The BFEE had an idiot cousin working at Fox noise calling Florida for the smirking gangster. Octafish Apr 2013 #4

Ditto cheers for Cliff Arnebeck! FarPoint Apr 2013 #16

Thanks to Octafish, expert on major media and politics Cliff Arnebeck Apr 2013 #41

Of course he was complicit. HappyMe Apr 2013 #6

Yes, he did. He had Katherine Harris, his entire crooked family, mostly The USSC who committed sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #10

We have our work cut out for us for 2014 and beyond. HappyMe Apr 2013 #15

the protest or fracture will throw the election to Jeb. Is it not obvious? graham4anything Apr 2013 #24

So what you are saying is that we should never, ever protest bad policies put forward by our sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #27

Words have consequences. So do actions.Protesters are small minorities with loud voices graham4anything Apr 2013 #30

Too dumb to be the brains of the operation but he had to be actively complicit to pull it off. Gidney N Cloyd Apr 2013 #11

Exactly. nt Lisa0825 Apr 2013 #25

Kick! hedgehog Apr 2013 #29

Really? Theft of the Presidency? jschurchin Apr 2013 #32

Why it's important that the posters and voters in this thread consider your point of view Cliff Arnebeck Apr 2013 #36

My comment on this to Paul Krugman, in regard to his distaste for G.W. Bush Cliff Arnebeck Apr 2013 #42

Thank you for the links Cliff jschurchin Apr 2013 #43

What would you call it? Zoeisright Apr 2013 #46

There are semantical issues with the poll. ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #33

Both the 2000 and 2004 Presidential elections were a product of criminal election theft activity Cliff Arnebeck Apr 2013 #40

Bush has a thing for being the one to call shots. Knightraven Apr 2013 #37

JEB BUSH was complicit too! Auntie Bush Apr 2013 #38

Oh he definitely stole it no question, Initech Apr 2013 #39

Definitely innocent....... whistler162 Apr 2013 #45

Rove benefits from the vitriol unleashed against President G.W. Bush Cliff Arnebeck Apr 2013 #53

Hell yes, ridiculous to even suggest otherwise. lpbk2713 Apr 2013 #54

Bush made it pretty clear he didn't believe it when Florida was called for Gore. mattclearing Apr 2013 #55