Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Government’s War on the Press [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)3. Nice knee-jerk; shows what you know. CounterPunch publishes Coleen Rowley...
...GOOGLE her if you don't know the name. For those who like to read, the "Why?":
The Militarized Crackdown on Political Protesters
No Victors in the War on Dissent
by COLEEN ROWLEY And WILLIAM JAMES COX
CounterPunch JANUARY 13, 2009
EXCERPT...
The Church Committee unearthed evidence in 1976 that the Viet Nam War had provided cover for the domestic infiltration and wiretapping of civil rights and anti-war groups and resulted in legislation and regulations against the worst abuses. However, the history of government repression and spying on those who dissent against its policies and practices seems to be repeating itself.
Following 9-11, the Bush Administration erased or circumvented many of these hard-won legal restraints. Warrantless searches under the PATRIOT Act and illegal electronic surveillance swept up more than terrorist threats as the government increasingly confused dissent, which builds up a free and democratic society, with terrorism, which seeks to tear it down.
The law enforcement response has become increasingly harsh and heavy-handed since the anti-globalization protests in 1999 in Seattle against the World Trade Organization. In November 2003, as many as 40 different law enforcement agencies invaded Miami during meetings relating to the Free Trade Area of the Americas. Protest groups were infiltrated by the police, the corporate media was embedded with law enforcement, and the independent media was suppressed.
The New York City police department used Miami tactics in 2004 at the Republican National Convention (RNC) during which hundreds of peaceful demonstrators and innocent bystanders were illegally arrested, fingerprinted, photographed, and subjected to prolonged detention in wire cages before being released without prosecution. Repressive tactics were also used the same year as a counter-terrorism measure at the Democratic National Convention, where Boston police established a designated fenced enclosure topped by razor wire as the free speech zone.
CONTINUED COINTELPRO...
http://www.counterpunch.org/2009/01/13/no-victors-in-the-war-on-dissent/
...let alone appreciate a free press and the free exchange of ideas, a democratic ideal if there ever was one.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
23 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

As a sidelight, it's interesting to learn of the corruption of the fbi during the Free Speech Move-
byeya
May 2013
#7
"it's worse than you think and they are out to get you"...I learned a lot I didn't know
byeya
May 2013
#10
Not even U.S. SENATORs can talk about what the Federal Government is doing to the American people.
Octafish
May 2013
#11
Now suppose you use all that intelligence gained from universal spying for personal gain?
Octafish
May 2013
#16
Here's my two centavos: Under J.Edgar Hoover the fbi gathered all sorts of information sometimes
byeya
May 2013
#13
Seeing how no one has gone to jail after lying America into an illegal and unnecessary war...
Octafish
May 2013
#14
The "investigative" journalism based on an anonymous source is important to the 1%
byeya
May 2013
#17