Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
18. FOX is Right.
Sat May 18, 2013, 02:37 PM
May 2013

Last edited Sat May 18, 2013, 03:33 PM - Edit history (1)

Along with Rev. Freeping Sun Myung Moon, FCC let Freeping Rupert the Alien Murdoch in to rule the roost.

Vice President George Herbert Walker Bush led the deregulation efforts, from the FCC to INS to Wall Street to West.



The War against the Regulatory Cops on the Bank Beat

Monday, 30 July 2012 07:26
By William K. Black

EXCERPT...

The LIBOR and HSBC scandals simply confirm that the largest banks in the world will repeatedly violate the law and lie if they believe they can get away with it. The only entity that should consistently have the incentive to tell senior regulators the truth about problem and fraudulent banks are the examiners. Similarly, banks with honest senior leaders should love the independence of examines. Blankfein is right about examiners – they “don’t work for us.” That is why they are uniquely valuable. Examiners routinely speak truth to power. The author has no clue how rare and how valuable that is to an honest bank’s senior managers, to senior regulators, and the nation. The author also has idea how threatening a trait it is to the CEO running a control fraud.

SNIP...

The anti-regulators won prior wars on examiners – and produced recurrent disasters

Neither the WSJ author, Tarullo, nor whatever failed economist is telling Tarullo that information provided by the industry constitutes “hard data” is aware that we have heard this refrain before. [font color="red"]President Reagan’s task force on financial deregulation, chaired by Vice President Bush, recommended cutting the number of examiners and relying primarily on data provided by the banks and S&Ls. The Reagan administration immediately cut the number of S&L regulators. The results were disastrous.[/font color] California and Texas cut dramatically the number of their S&L examiners and supervisors. The results were disastrous.

The nonprime industry did something analogous. They reduced their reliance on loan underwriters and substitute reliance on automatic underwriting systems. These were grotesquely unsophisticated systems that typically ignored and facilitated fraud by the lenders and their agents. They were invariably called “sophisticated” systems. Their testing was farcical. To ensure the worst of both worlds, the fraudulent lenders’ managers could always override the automatic underwriting system and use “exception” authority to approve the worst loans. Countrywide was a classic example of a faux automatic underwriting system surrounded by tens of thousands of flaky exceptions. The results were disastrous. Experienced human underwriters invariably found copious bad nonprime mortgage loans. The fraudulent lenders (and purchasers) treated underwriters who displayed competence and integrity as the enemy. The results were disastrous.

The FDIC and the OTS cut the number of their examiners and sought to rely far more on the data provided by the industry. The results were disastrous. The Basel II economists who encouraged the SDIs and their regulators to rely on the SDIs’ proprietary models believed that doing so would allow “sophisticated” banking and regulatory decisions to be made on the basis of “hard data” that were far more reliable than examiners. The results were disastrous.

I doubt that there are five economists in the world who know this consistent history of disastrous failure. The chance that the pseudo-supervisors advising Tarullo knows of the failed history of efforts to substitute reliance on industry-supplied information as “hard data” for the judgment and expertise of examiners is nil.

CONTINUED...

http://therealnews.com/t2/component/content/article/75-more-blog-posts-from-william-black/1130-the-war-against-the-regulatory-cops-on-the-bank-beat



Of course, Poppy's Dim Son was there for Deregulation II in 2008 when all those trillions vanished into thin air. A coincidence, no doubt, missed by the Vanguards of the National Press Corpse.

You got a great memory, siligut. If more people knew what you knew, the greedheads and warmongers would be on the run rather than affording to lawyer up. Thank you!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Unfortunately True, Sir The Magistrate May 2013 #1
Politics is Democracy, Sir. Octafish May 2013 #11
I would say your post accounts for maybe 90% of the problem. Another, minor one, is Hollywood byeya May 2013 #2
BillboReilly slipped up yesterday re: Hollywood... dogknob May 2013 #5
That's really funny - thanks. Usually the Wingsters are better at following the script. byeya May 2013 #6
Let me guess his reasoning... Scootaloo May 2013 #16
I think Karl Rove has that poster in his bedroom byeya May 2013 #33
I think Karl Rove has a picture of Hitler in his bedroom watoos May 2013 #41
No, sorry. He wasn't saying that he likes hollywood: He thinks superheroes are real: Not film fictio lindysalsagal May 2013 #38
Didnt Nietzsche also think there were super hero's? Those that were superior to the norm? nm rhett o rick May 2013 #47
That programming right there is an essential factor across the whole political spectrum. People patrice May 2013 #9
Thanks for bringing up Alex Carey. nt MrScorpio May 2013 #3
You are welcome. I first learned about his important work on DU... Octafish May 2013 #32
Freud's nephew, chervilant May 2013 #43
Sad to say, but those that have known this have known it for a long time, Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #4
Message Machine PENTAGON and what Dorothy Parker said. Octafish May 2013 #34
Quite true Doctor_J May 2013 #46
I have been wondering how hate for Unions motivates what Bush's people do, so they grab all patrice May 2013 #7
And a lot of Democrats who were in the know just opened their gobs and said, 'Ah hah' and got along. Octafish May 2013 #35
K&R for later... nt Mnemosyne May 2013 #8
Money. Octafish May 2013 #36
The wool has been pulled over our eyes. JEB May 2013 #10
Serfs got ears, eyes, driver's licences... Octafish May 2013 #49
Armed resistance JEB May 2013 #50
yep, there is no denying G_j May 2013 #12
K&R. So true. Overseas May 2013 #13
I think television is the worst. I don't watch it all. hunter May 2013 #14
I knew it was Reagan siligut May 2013 #15
FOX is Right. Octafish May 2013 #18
The results were disastrous chervilant May 2013 #45
I'd say that our media situation is starting to closely resemble... Wounded Bear May 2013 #17
Starting? That is my only quibble with your post nadinbrzezinski May 2013 #21
Because "we" don't want to? bhikkhu May 2013 #19
I don't quite agree cprise May 2013 #27
Because the popular media is a wasteland -- national and local. LuckyLib May 2013 #20
Bill Clinton put the final nail in the coffin with the Telecommunication Deregulation Act. OnyxCollie May 2013 #22
Yes he did. I supported that SOB in 1992 with much more than I care to think about. Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #37
Don't forget to thank Bill Clinton.... bvar22 May 2013 #23
I think even Bob Dole said this was an unwarranted giveaway of public airspace. He probably ended byeya May 2013 #30
Many people don't want to learn anything, they prefer corporate propaganda Corruption Inc May 2013 #24
Welcome to DU nadinbrzezinski May 2013 #26
But these people also usually need something strong to wash it down cprise May 2013 #28
Agreed treestar May 2013 #57
And now they own the prisons, and they're coming for our education. Initech May 2013 #25
Watch the docu I posted here cprise May 2013 #29
The GEM$MNBCDEFG is the tool of the 1%. Rex May 2013 #31
Awesome post. Propaganda for the “manufacture of consent” ~ that's it. nt Zorra May 2013 #39
Narrowcasting ... GeorgeGist May 2013 #40
Another great thread, Octafish. CanSocDem May 2013 #42
K&R'd & Bookmarked--very helpful! snot May 2013 #44
isn't that one of the corporate talking points? hfojvt May 2013 #48
Things may not be as Orwellian as all that ucrdem May 2013 #51
Hadn't heard that. Do know that it's no conspiracy theory. It's a war. Octafish May 2013 #53
no argument about the pollution hfojvt May 2013 #54
George W Bush was 6 ft tall and George Herbert Bush was 6 ft 2 inchs tall coldmountain May 2013 #52
Prescott S Bush was 6 ft 4 inches tall Octafish May 2013 #58
Recommend #100! H2O Man May 2013 #55
I was getting news from the BBC treestar May 2013 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wanna Know Why We the Peo...»Reply #18