Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Wanna Know Why We the People Really Don't Know Squat? [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)53. Hadn't heard that. Do know that it's no conspiracy theory. It's a war.
One can call it a class war or a war for minds, I don't give a damn. The information environment in which we live is most polluted by those who can most afford to make noise.
METHODS OF MEDIA MANIPULATION
by Michael Parenti
Media Alliance
We are told by media people that some news bias is unavoidable. Distortions are caused by deadline pressures, human misjudgment, budgetary restraints, and the difficulty of reducing a complex story into a concise report. Furthermore, the argument goes, no communication system can hope to report everything. Selectivity is needed.
I would argue that the media's misrepresentations are not all the result of innocent error and everyday production problems, though such problems certainly exist. True, the press has to be selective--but what principle of selectivity is involved? Media bias does not occur in a random fashion; rather it moves in the same overall direction again and again, favoring management over labor, corporations over corporate critics, affluent Whites over low-income minorities, officialdom over protesters, the two-party monopoly over leftist third parties, privatization and free market "reforms" over public-sector development, U.S. corporate dominance of the Third World over revolutionary social change, and conservative commentators and columnists like Rush Limbaugh and George Will over progressive or populist ones like Jim Hightower and Ralph Nader (not to mention more radical ones).
The corporate mainstream media seldom stray into territory that might cause discomfort to those who hold political and economic power, including those who own the media or advertise in it.
SNIP...
Labeling. A label predefines a subject by simply giving it a positive or negative tag without the benefit of any explanatory details. Some positive labels are: "stability," "the president's firm leadership," and "a strong defense." Some negative ones are: "leftist guerrillas," "Islamic terrorists," and "conspiracy theorists." In the June 1998 California campaign for Proposition 226, a measure designed to cripple the political activities of organized labor, union leaders were repeatedly labeled "union bosses," while corporate leaders were never called "corporate bosses." The press itself is falsely labeled "the liberal media" by the hundreds of conservative columnists, commentators, and talk-show hosts who crowd the communications universe with complaints about being shut out of it.
A strikingly deceptive label is "reform," a word that is misapplied to the dismantling of social reforms. So the media talked of "welfare reform" when referring to the elimination of family assistance programs. Over the last 30 years, "tax reform" has served as a deceptive euphemism for laws that have repeatedly reduced upper-income taxes, shifting the payment burden still more regressively upon middle- and low-income strata.
CONTINUED...
http://mediaalliance2.live.radicaldesigns.org/article.php?id=510
Something else I know: For Democracy to function, let alone survive, it requires an informed electorate. Personally, I believe that should include the entire populace. But, hey, that's just me. I'm a Democrat of the Old School.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I would say your post accounts for maybe 90% of the problem. Another, minor one, is Hollywood
byeya
May 2013
#2
That's really funny - thanks. Usually the Wingsters are better at following the script.
byeya
May 2013
#6
No, sorry. He wasn't saying that he likes hollywood: He thinks superheroes are real: Not film fictio
lindysalsagal
May 2013
#38
Didnt Nietzsche also think there were super hero's? Those that were superior to the norm? nm
rhett o rick
May 2013
#47
That programming right there is an essential factor across the whole political spectrum. People
patrice
May 2013
#9
Sad to say, but those that have known this have known it for a long time,
Egalitarian Thug
May 2013
#4
I have been wondering how hate for Unions motivates what Bush's people do, so they grab all
patrice
May 2013
#7
And a lot of Democrats who were in the know just opened their gobs and said, 'Ah hah' and got along.
Octafish
May 2013
#35
Bill Clinton put the final nail in the coffin with the Telecommunication Deregulation Act.
OnyxCollie
May 2013
#22
Yes he did. I supported that SOB in 1992 with much more than I care to think about.
Egalitarian Thug
May 2013
#37
I think even Bob Dole said this was an unwarranted giveaway of public airspace. He probably ended
byeya
May 2013
#30
Many people don't want to learn anything, they prefer corporate propaganda
Corruption Inc
May 2013
#24