Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Forcing down Evo Morales's plane was an act of air piracy [View all]Hydra
(14,459 posts)75. There's a writeup thread in greatest
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023171264
Sorry, something came up and had to wander away for a bit.
In a nutshell, a "mysterious" someone told all the players in this that Snowden was on board the plane. This has been admitted to by basically all sources today. Everyone is pretending we don't know who this someone is. These countries basically blockaded the Bolivian President's plane, either by denying airspace or ability to land for fuel to cross the Atlantic with. They were forced to double back to Vienna to get refueled. In Vienna, they were pressured to allow a search of the plane by various people. Morales refused, and after 13 hours they gave up and let him go.
So far we can assume Snowden wasn't aboard...but we can't really be sure.
There is an alternate theory that they needed to make a repair, but I checked the flight record, and they were 3/4 of the way through Austria before they turned around and backtracked to Vienna. You'd think they'd want to park somewhere closer?
Anyway, there were suggestions that this was all a big misunderstanding, but a lot of high level people are apologizing to Morales about it, saying they were trying to catch Snowden. IMO: Huge Imperial diplo blunder.
Sorry, something came up and had to wander away for a bit.
In a nutshell, a "mysterious" someone told all the players in this that Snowden was on board the plane. This has been admitted to by basically all sources today. Everyone is pretending we don't know who this someone is. These countries basically blockaded the Bolivian President's plane, either by denying airspace or ability to land for fuel to cross the Atlantic with. They were forced to double back to Vienna to get refueled. In Vienna, they were pressured to allow a search of the plane by various people. Morales refused, and after 13 hours they gave up and let him go.
So far we can assume Snowden wasn't aboard...but we can't really be sure.
There is an alternate theory that they needed to make a repair, but I checked the flight record, and they were 3/4 of the way through Austria before they turned around and backtracked to Vienna. You'd think they'd want to park somewhere closer?
Anyway, there were suggestions that this was all a big misunderstanding, but a lot of high level people are apologizing to Morales about it, saying they were trying to catch Snowden. IMO: Huge Imperial diplo blunder.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Pilger is one of the most informed investigative journalists in the news business today.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#99
The decision to close air space to a diplomatic flight could only've come from Kerry's boss.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#37
I don't know, when will someone from your side address important questions such as:
okaawhatever
Jul 2013
#49
Repeatedly spamming a board with one's own blue links, to the point...
SaveOurDemocracy
Jul 2013
#70
A diplomatic flight is prevented from re-fueling when scheduled and searched upon landing.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#43
Portugal wouldn't let him land. Spain would have, but France wouldn't let him fly through.
morningfog
Jul 2013
#27
You'd think we'd have more pull with the other countries but they didn't want to get involved?
randome
Jul 2013
#53
Ok Hydra and others, what is the truth here? I have read conflicting accounts on what happened so
cstanleytech
Jul 2013
#44
No one FORCED the aircraft to land. Their claim that they had fuel gauge problems is suspect.
okaawhatever
Jul 2013
#55
The aircraft had filed a flight plan, including authorization for re-fueling in Spain.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#60
I beg to differ. The authorization of the flight plan was for the Canary Islands. There may be a
okaawhatever
Jul 2013
#62
Freedom from persecution not freedom from prosecution. Important difference. n/t
SylviaD
Jul 2013
#42
It's pretty clear by now that Bolivia was pretty disengenuous regarding their account
Major Nikon
Jul 2013
#69
I wouldn't say Bolivia has been any more disingenuous that France or Spain or Austria...
Maedhros
Jul 2013
#105
Why don't we wait for the whole story to come out before jumping to conclusions?
Rstrstx
Jul 2013
#77
The FACT is that his plane was NOT forced to land. Please stop spreading misinformation.
Tx4obama
Jul 2013
#87
What did Snowden do that would make the United States government act like a fascist power?
Octafish
Jul 2013
#83
Morales shouldn't be held or diverted anywhere. That's the point of international treaties.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#96
Morales as a head of state doesn't have to pull his aircraft over for anybody.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#115
I'm glad you understand how traffic stop is an allegory for air piracy,
Progressive dog
Jul 2013
#120
With the exception of France, those nations all were onboard the CIA Torture Train.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#126
'The incident demonstrates...the Obama administration will go to any lengths to silence Snowden...
Octafish
Jul 2013
#98
You don't say! Universal Health Care? OMG!1!! Quick, sprinkle some holy water around to ward off the
idwiyo
Jul 2013
#100
The progress on issues that have nothing to do with power and profit are nice.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#125