Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Forcing down Evo Morales's plane was an act of air piracy [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)98. 'The incident demonstrates...the Obama administration will go to any lengths to silence Snowden...
...who has exposed the NSAs vast electronic surveillance of the American people and the worlds population." -- Peter Symonds
Bolivia accuses US of forced landing of presidential plane
By Peter Symonds
5 July 2013
The Bolivian government is planning a formal protest to the United Nations over the illegal actions of European countries in forcing the plane of President Evo Morales to make an emergency landing in Austria on Tuesday. The aircraft was brought down on suspicion that National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden was on board.
Morales was returning to Bolivia after an energy summit in Moscow, when Portugal, Italy, Spain and France all denied his plane access to their airspace. An unnamed Austrian official told Associated Press that the plane had requested permission to land in Vienna because there was no clear indication that it had enough fuel to continue its flight.
Bolivias ambassador to the UN, Sacha Liorenti Soliz, told the media: The decisions of these countries violated international law. We are already making ready procedures to denounce this to the UN secretary general We are talking about the president on an official trip, after an official summit, being kidnapped.
Liorenti bluntly accused the Obama administration of instigating the forced landing. We have no doubt that it was an order from the White House, he said. By no means should a diplomatic plane with the president be diverted from its route and forced to land in another country.
[font color="red"]After initial US denials of any involvement, State Department spokesman Jen Psaki admitted on Wednesday: We have been in contact with a range of countries that had a chance of having Snowden land or travel through their countries. But she refused to name the countries, or divulge when the discussions took place.[/font color]
CONTINUED...
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/07/05/snow-j05.html
Incredible things, what those socialists like Morales are up to...universal health care, education, work, housing...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Pilger is one of the most informed investigative journalists in the news business today.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#99
The decision to close air space to a diplomatic flight could only've come from Kerry's boss.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#37
I don't know, when will someone from your side address important questions such as:
okaawhatever
Jul 2013
#49
Repeatedly spamming a board with one's own blue links, to the point...
SaveOurDemocracy
Jul 2013
#70
A diplomatic flight is prevented from re-fueling when scheduled and searched upon landing.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#43
Portugal wouldn't let him land. Spain would have, but France wouldn't let him fly through.
morningfog
Jul 2013
#27
You'd think we'd have more pull with the other countries but they didn't want to get involved?
randome
Jul 2013
#53
Ok Hydra and others, what is the truth here? I have read conflicting accounts on what happened so
cstanleytech
Jul 2013
#44
No one FORCED the aircraft to land. Their claim that they had fuel gauge problems is suspect.
okaawhatever
Jul 2013
#55
The aircraft had filed a flight plan, including authorization for re-fueling in Spain.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#60
I beg to differ. The authorization of the flight plan was for the Canary Islands. There may be a
okaawhatever
Jul 2013
#62
Freedom from persecution not freedom from prosecution. Important difference. n/t
SylviaD
Jul 2013
#42
It's pretty clear by now that Bolivia was pretty disengenuous regarding their account
Major Nikon
Jul 2013
#69
I wouldn't say Bolivia has been any more disingenuous that France or Spain or Austria...
Maedhros
Jul 2013
#105
Why don't we wait for the whole story to come out before jumping to conclusions?
Rstrstx
Jul 2013
#77
The FACT is that his plane was NOT forced to land. Please stop spreading misinformation.
Tx4obama
Jul 2013
#87
What did Snowden do that would make the United States government act like a fascist power?
Octafish
Jul 2013
#83
Morales shouldn't be held or diverted anywhere. That's the point of international treaties.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#96
Morales as a head of state doesn't have to pull his aircraft over for anybody.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#115
I'm glad you understand how traffic stop is an allegory for air piracy,
Progressive dog
Jul 2013
#120
With the exception of France, those nations all were onboard the CIA Torture Train.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#126
'The incident demonstrates...the Obama administration will go to any lengths to silence Snowden...
Octafish
Jul 2013
#98
You don't say! Universal Health Care? OMG!1!! Quick, sprinkle some holy water around to ward off the
idwiyo
Jul 2013
#100
The progress on issues that have nothing to do with power and profit are nice.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#125