General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Snowden meeting in Moscow with Human Rights Groups now (Live) [View all]karynnj
(60,472 posts)Anyone paying attention in Dec 2006 through August 2007 KNEW that Congress approved the FISA bill that allowed the collection of telephone usage information. What the government did was neither illegal or immoral - and the purpose is to detect terrorists before they strike.
I really have no more problem with the government having my phone records than the phone company having them. In the first place, it is extremely unlikely that the NSA would ever find me suspect (or interesting) enough to spend the resources to profile me. I have MORE of a problem with the massive amount of data the credit rating companies have on me - this is a far richer, more detailed data base -- and they have at times sold the information to third parties.
My point is that Snowden took a job that required promising not to leak classified information - and it may have been his intent EVEN AS HE SIGNED THAT AGREEMENT to do just that. You can't have everyone working with sensitive information deciding UNILATERALLY what they can put out. (ie what if someone working for the IRS decided that entire tax returns of everyone in his town - coincidentally yours - should be public information and put it out on a web site.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):