If Snowden's case as a whistleblower is so strong, why is he afraid to face the consequences?

[ProSense]

76. How about

No, in all honesty, how many are enough?

I ask with no malice. If your intent is to convince people, I think you do your cause more harm than good by bludgeoning people with 5 to 10 threads saying the same thing.

It is absolutely your right to do so, I suspect it is counter productive if your goal is to persuade.

...six? Is that enough if the "intent is to convince people"? Does it "cause more harm than good by bludgeoning people" with six threads? Is it "counter productive if your goal is to persuade"?

General Discussion
Snowden meeting in Moscow with Human Rights Groups now (Live)
38 recs : By Catherina

General Discussion
Greenwald Says He's Not Halfway Done Revealing Snowden's Information
22 recs : By Catherina

General Discussion
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights calls for respect for Snowden's right to seek asylum
20 recs : By Catherina

General Discussion
South American bloc repudiates U.S. on spying, Snowden
14 recs : By Catherina

General Discussion
HRW: No Ordinary Day in Moscow & Amnesty International: Hounding of Snowden must stop
14 recs : By Catherina

General Discussion
White House: Russia shouldn't provide Snowden with 'propaganda platform'
13 recs : By Catherina

That's just from the Greatest Page. I doubt you expressed a single concern in any of them.

Counting threads and posts and using that in an attempt to derail a discussion is not genuine. It's disingenuous bullshit.

Just admit that you're pissed about criticism of Snowden instead of hijacking the thread with faux concern.