Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)

9. People often expected and got justice, only to

Reply to GeorgeGist (Reply #3)

Sun Jul 14, 2013, 03:17 PM

Jul 2013

find 25 years later the DNA doesn't match.

What people think is justice is not always correct.

That is why a cold-minded system is better, for this purpose, than an emotional goal. It is designed to not always give us what we want.

We could decide all cases based on public opinion polling and thus always give the people what the people think is justice.
Would anyone really think that a better way to go?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If "we" wrote the laws today no poor or minority person would ever be acquitted. Ever. [View all] cthulu2016 Jul 2013 OP

The system is designed to be subjective enough to allow predujuice to excuse some crimes... NoOneMan Jul 2013 #1

Superbly written LittleBlue Jul 2013 #2

I note that in your entire OP you never once mention justice. GeorgeGist Jul 2013 #3

People often expected and got justice, only to cthulu2016 Jul 2013 #9

If that is true - how come we have a quarter of the worlds prisoner population. Democracyinkind Jul 2013 #4

The number of people in prisons is, imho, to a large part due to anomiep Jul 2013 #8

We have so many people in prison for a few reasons. Igel Jul 2013 #14

I don't blame the jury or the prosecutors. morningfog Jul 2013 #5

The six-person jury is pretty odd. NaturalHigh Jul 2013 #6

What do you mean by 'not treated as a suspect' anomiep Jul 2013 #13

I remember "reasonable doubt" and "right not to testify" existing at the time of OJ Simpson's trial. Nye Bevan Jul 2013 #7

Actually, the laws don't have to be 'rewritten' to see this happen... Spazito Jul 2013 #10

Somehow ProSense Jul 2013 #11

I don't regard is as justification. But it is an explanation. onenote Jul 2013 #12