Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Glenn Greenwald POPPED Tim Geithner in the chops, way before it was cool. [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)60. Wrong. Here's his report on Cheney's efforts to cover-up treason and hope for another 9-11.
Dick Cheneys top aide: Were one bomb away from our goal
Revelations by Jack Goldsmith -- a right-wing, former high-level Bush DOJ lawyer -- demonstrate the true extent of the administration's lawlessness.
BY GLENN GREENWALD
Salon.com TUESDAY, SEP 4, 2007 07:25 AM EDT
In October of 2003, Jack Goldsmith a right-wing lawyer with radical views of executive power and long-time friend of John Yoo was named by the Bush administration to head the DOJs Office of Legal Counsel, one of the most influential legal positions in the executive branch. During his tenure, he discovered numerous legal positions which the administration had adopted (many created by Yoo) that he found baseless and even unconscionable from torture to detention powers to illegal surveillance and he repudiated many of them, thereby repeatedly infuriating the most powerful White House officials, led by Cheney top aide David Addington. As a result, his tenure was extremely brief, and he was gone a mere 9 months after he began.
Goldsmith, now a Harvard Law Professor, has just written a book, to be released this month, criticizing and, in some cases, exposing for the first time, many of Bushs executive power abuses. He is donating all the proceeds from the book to charity to prevent the standard integrity attacks which Bush followers launch at any ex-officials who commit such blasphemy. In a lengthy profile in The New York Times Magazine, Jeffrey Rosen profiles Goldsmith and highlights some of the books key revelations.
Two revelations in particular are extraordinary and deserve (but are unlikely to receive) intense media coverage. First, it was Goldsmith who first argued that the administrations secret, warrantless surveillance programs were illegal, and it was that conclusion which sparked the now famous refusal of Ashcroft/Comey in early 2004 to certify the programs legality. Goldsmith argued continuously about his conclusion with Addington, and during the course of those arguments, this is what happened:
[font color="green"]Their goal all along was to get rid of the obnoxious FISA court entirely, so that they could freely eavesdrop on whomever they wanted with no warrants or oversight of any kind. And here is Dick Cheneys top aide, drooling with anticipation at the prospect of another terrorist attack so that they could seize this power without challenge. Addington views the Next Terrorist Attack as the golden opportunity to seize yet more power. Sitting around the White House dreaming of all the great new powers they will have once the new terrorist attack occurs as Addington was doing is nothing short of deranged.[/font color]
CONTINUED...
http://www.salon.com/2007/09/04/addington/
That is real reporting and top analysis. If the nation's corporate-owned and operated mass media monopoly covered questions of war and peace so thoroughly, let alone finance and its impact on the 99-percent, this would be a different nation -- a much better nation.
Revelations by Jack Goldsmith -- a right-wing, former high-level Bush DOJ lawyer -- demonstrate the true extent of the administration's lawlessness.
BY GLENN GREENWALD
Salon.com TUESDAY, SEP 4, 2007 07:25 AM EDT
In October of 2003, Jack Goldsmith a right-wing lawyer with radical views of executive power and long-time friend of John Yoo was named by the Bush administration to head the DOJs Office of Legal Counsel, one of the most influential legal positions in the executive branch. During his tenure, he discovered numerous legal positions which the administration had adopted (many created by Yoo) that he found baseless and even unconscionable from torture to detention powers to illegal surveillance and he repudiated many of them, thereby repeatedly infuriating the most powerful White House officials, led by Cheney top aide David Addington. As a result, his tenure was extremely brief, and he was gone a mere 9 months after he began.
Goldsmith, now a Harvard Law Professor, has just written a book, to be released this month, criticizing and, in some cases, exposing for the first time, many of Bushs executive power abuses. He is donating all the proceeds from the book to charity to prevent the standard integrity attacks which Bush followers launch at any ex-officials who commit such blasphemy. In a lengthy profile in The New York Times Magazine, Jeffrey Rosen profiles Goldsmith and highlights some of the books key revelations.
Two revelations in particular are extraordinary and deserve (but are unlikely to receive) intense media coverage. First, it was Goldsmith who first argued that the administrations secret, warrantless surveillance programs were illegal, and it was that conclusion which sparked the now famous refusal of Ashcroft/Comey in early 2004 to certify the programs legality. Goldsmith argued continuously about his conclusion with Addington, and during the course of those arguments, this is what happened:
[Goldsmith] shared the White Houses concern that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act might prevent wiretaps on international calls involving terrorists. But Goldsmith deplored the way the White House tried to fix the problem, which was highly contemptuous of Congress and the courts. Were one bomb away from getting rid of that obnoxious [FISA] court, Goldsmith recalls Addington telling him in February 2004.
[font color="green"]Their goal all along was to get rid of the obnoxious FISA court entirely, so that they could freely eavesdrop on whomever they wanted with no warrants or oversight of any kind. And here is Dick Cheneys top aide, drooling with anticipation at the prospect of another terrorist attack so that they could seize this power without challenge. Addington views the Next Terrorist Attack as the golden opportunity to seize yet more power. Sitting around the White House dreaming of all the great new powers they will have once the new terrorist attack occurs as Addington was doing is nothing short of deranged.[/font color]
CONTINUED...
http://www.salon.com/2007/09/04/addington/
That is real reporting and top analysis. If the nation's corporate-owned and operated mass media monopoly covered questions of war and peace so thoroughly, let alone finance and its impact on the 99-percent, this would be a different nation -- a much better nation.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Glenn Greenwald POPPED Tim Geithner in the chops, way before it was cool. [View all]
Octafish
Jul 2013
OP
And another contentless comment on the journalist rather than on the content of the OP.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#4
Tax payers are being forced to PAY to hear Greenwald say what he's always been saying for free.
railsback
Jul 2013
#9
Tax payers were forced to pay for the gambling debts of the Wall St crooks and so far, not one of
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#12
Tax payers are also forced to pay the salaries of people like Boehner and King
railsback
Jul 2013
#20
You left out the Democrats who single handedly, without much help from the Republicans, voted to
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#27
Most of the miscreants could be put away if there was only the will to do it.
Enthusiast
Jul 2013
#65
Do you ever post anything but snark? Do you qualify as "politically liberal"??? nm
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#17
No, it's truthful to point out blatant hypocrisy and cherry picking which I just did in this thread.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#28
You haven't been keeping up. YOU all made it about Greenwald, so all we are doing is cooperating now
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#33
Every post by that one seems to be substance-free. Even that poster's initial post in this thread
xocet
Jul 2013
#70
Greenwald called for Cheney and the rest of the war criminals to be prosecuted. Did you?
Octafish
Jul 2013
#39
I hear he's going to be on the Pulitzer Prize list for Journalist of the year.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#16
That's possible, but that is more likely to go to someone like Bradley Manning, Assange or Snowden.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#29
I hear what you are saying. I guess I have to gather my thoughts for another post
Pretzel_Warrior
Jul 2013
#38
You guys are looking more and more desperate with your sad ad hominem comments. nm
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#18
what, i'm simply using the exact same catchphrases you guys have used. oh wait...
dionysus
Jul 2013
#58
He deserves more than that just for this article on Washington immunizing lawbreaking Telecoms.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#44
While people were marching in the streets against the Patriot Act and the Iraq War....
Cali_Democrat
Jul 2013
#3
I love it when one of the six talking points outlined by Greenwald himself, arrive in every thread
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#6
We can bring up old information about Greenwald supposedly popping Tim Geithner in the chops
Cali_Democrat
Jul 2013
#11
Okay. Yes, it was admirable that Greenwald, as a private citizen no one had ever heard of,
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#59
Not getting your point at all. You are using his words admitting to his error in judgement re
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#78
Well you could post the words you claim are 'hypocritical'. We only disagree if there are words
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#82
Of course it is. But when you post something that no one seems to understand, and you can't
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#89
Wow, well that says it all, for sure. A private citizen V elected officials with the power to send
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#50
The NSa apologists have to get their stories straight. Some say that Greenwald lies at every breath,
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#79
I agree. Are you willing to forgive Ms. Clinton and support her bid for the presidency? nm
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#55
It's too early for me to think about that. The next Prez won't be sworn in until 2017. n/t
Cali_Democrat
Jul 2013
#112
When Greenwald found out Bush & Cheney lied, he called for their prosecution. Did you?
Octafish
Jul 2013
#54
She may not be under the bus yet, but "The Group" avoid posts about her like the plague.
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#37
Well it's a kinder label than others use. And I have a hunch you know what I mean. nm
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#46
Well if you would all stop talking about him, he wouldn't appear to be 'so adored' as you call
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#10
No need to apologize, you haven't annoyed me in the least. I love this stuff unlike many other DUers
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#41
Oh, I don't share your pessism. I see plenty of critical thinking around the Left forums these days,
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#57
I can agree what your definition of a real journalist is, but could you provide one as an example?nt
adirondacker
Jul 2013
#49
Wrong. Here's his report on Cheney's efforts to cover-up treason and hope for another 9-11.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#60
Derivatives are like a calculus: confusing and designed to leave someone else holding the tab.
Octafish
Jul 2013
#96
Lol, what an interesting 'series of events'. The 'caffeine fiend' was an obvious troll, although I
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#101
Please tell: Where else did you see any of the conflicts-of-interest and criminality even mentioned?
Octafish
Jul 2013
#109
"It's not just Snowden and illegal NSA spying, Big Money hates Greenwald"
Progressive dog
Jul 2013
#106