Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)

3. His searches were "circumspect"? Where do you get this?

Reply to think (Reply #1)

Fri Aug 2, 2013, 12:20 AM

Aug 2013

Last edited Fri Aug 2, 2013, 12:59 AM - Edit history (1)

It's clear that she was only guessing why the police arrived, and she didn't know the biggest piece of the puzzle.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Proof the NSA did not spy on Michele Catalano after all: update from her blog. [View all] pnwmom Aug 2013 OP

So his searches were circumspect but the backpack & pressure cooker think Aug 2013 #1

His searches were "circumspect"? Where do you get this? pnwmom Aug 2013 #3

But that still makes no sense leftstreet Aug 2013 #7

The NSA had NOTHING to do with this. Got it? frazzled Aug 2013 #4

"the searches involved also things my husband looked up at his old job" think Aug 2013 #10

I give up. frazzled Aug 2013 #12

I asked for a link and you are quick to judge me think Aug 2013 #14

I know what you mean! nt Andy823 Aug 2013 #36

From echelon, the dictionary (collection of key words) nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #18

The lesson from this is ... frazzled Aug 2013 #2

None of this is news to me. Maybe you're talking to someone else. pnwmom Aug 2013 #5

I'm talking about the topic, to the board frazzled Aug 2013 #6

yipers..../nt think Aug 2013 #17

You said, "I've got news for you." And so for some dumb reason I thought pnwmom Aug 2013 #22

The lesson could be that it is still fucked up. morningfog Aug 2013 #8

His former employer called the police frazzled Aug 2013 #9

That's fine. Do you have a link? I haven't been glued to this case think Aug 2013 #11

The update in the story, valid and worth noting, morningfog Aug 2013 #15

I am weak. I put around 60 people on ignore today think Aug 2013 #21

How can you decide there was any wrong doing here pnwmom Aug 2013 #26

Did she completely retract? morningfog Aug 2013 #28

It is clear that the search was triggered by the employer pnwmom Aug 2013 #30

Six joint terrorism task force members searched a guys home morningfog Aug 2013 #13

"things my husband looked up at work" could mean something very extensive pnwmom Aug 2013 #24

And the police acted. morningfog Aug 2013 #27

And you expect the woman would tell us if her husband HAD done something pnwmom Aug 2013 #31

Brilliant, frazzled.. Mahalo Russia seems so wonderful Cha Aug 2013 #29

+1 n/t Life Long Dem Aug 2013 #35

I can see what folks are doing on a company firewall.. HipChick Aug 2013 #16

He was fired with good reason. morningfog Aug 2013 #19

That would depend entirely on what you were searching for. pnwmom Aug 2013 #23

We are dealing with a specific case here. morningfog Aug 2013 #25

No. And the police aren't going to be telling us either, unless they decide to charge him. pnwmom Aug 2013 #32

People spreading this false story have an agenda. Cha Aug 2013 #20

Yep. Scurrilous Aug 2013 #33

"NSA=Obama=Bad!11 Everyone else is Blameless Putin Propaganda=Good!" Cha Aug 2013 #34

Exactly Andy823 Aug 2013 #37