Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
28. oh what nonsense.
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 10:06 AM
Aug 2013

Last edited Tue Aug 6, 2013, 11:18 AM - Edit history (1)

Today any potential parent with a milligram of empathy and compassion will refrain from procreating. Only someone who is completely bound up in their own psychic wounds and egoic needs would even consider bringing a helpless child into the buzz-saw world that's unfolding around us.

Some members of every generation for millennia have seen the world/society as on the precipice of crashing down. Yes, it seems particularly dire now but imagine what it seemed like in other periods; for example in 1941, or during the depression or the plague years in Europe.

To claim that anyone who wants to have children- without any evidence- is severely damaged, is ludicrous.
Our youngest has a very high IQ and... liberal N proud Aug 2013 #1
Mine is 22, and she says if she has kids, it will be through adoption. AngryOldDem Aug 2013 #2
That is to say, SMART young people are aware… Jackpine Radical Aug 2013 #35
Duly noted! n/t AngryOldDem Aug 2013 #36
I believe this to be true! hamsterjill Aug 2013 #158
My fear is Idiocracy was a documentary AngryAmish Aug 2013 #3
not was, IS. hobbit709 Aug 2013 #10
Yeah, but who's fault was that? The2ndWheel Aug 2013 #19
+10 RC Aug 2013 #33
I have struggled with that question my whole life. nt Sivafae Aug 2013 #87
I'll see that and raise you DonCoquixote Aug 2013 #114
Yet religion isn't genetic get the red out Aug 2013 #139
Religious fundies have such crappy, boring, lives unless they have several children. Quantess Aug 2013 #196
This message was self-deleted by its author Electric Monk Aug 2013 #133
Indeed. Here is the section which so accurately documented the trend cited in the OP KurtNYC Aug 2013 #37
My fear is that Idiocracy reflects the ongoing influence of the eugenics hedgehog Aug 2013 #54
and that was one reason why it was released in about five theaters nationwide AngryAmish Aug 2013 #115
Correct. JackRiddler Aug 2013 #134
Luckily it was just a horrible movie instead. Dash87 Aug 2013 #170
no it doesn't. It's purely anecdotal. That doesn't add evidence. cali Aug 2013 #22
My husband and I are academics w/no kids. I am NOT suggesting that I have a high IQ anneboleyn Aug 2013 #106
Just proves that the menfolk don't like breeding with them smart wimmins. Orrex Aug 2013 #4
In general men don't mind marrying down the IQ ladder, women do AngryAmish Aug 2013 #12
That just shows that men and women are shallow in different ways Orrex Aug 2013 #14
yeah, how about it? AngryAmish Aug 2013 #17
Great post....that's been my observation & experience as well. nt raccoon Aug 2013 #68
I prefer smart women. Much prefer. RC Aug 2013 #34
Idiots? Seriously? cherokeeprogressive Aug 2013 #5
misleading title (not your fault, of course) magical thyme Aug 2013 #6
Speaking of specimens... pipi_k Aug 2013 #24
ah, but was it a "clean catch" poop? magical thyme Aug 2013 #26
I'm pretty sure pipi_k Aug 2013 #48
What you are describing is someone who didn't have the same vocabulary as you - hedgehog Aug 2013 #55
Not mentally challenged pipi_k Aug 2013 #100
Where did she thing the penis was going during sexual intercourse? Chemisse Aug 2013 #177
That wouldn't say much for all of our mothers The2ndWheel Aug 2013 #7
Mother's Day is mawkish, sentimental, pro-breeding propaganda. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #18
Damned if you do or don't The2ndWheel Aug 2013 #25
oh what nonsense. cali Aug 2013 #28
+ a really big number onenote Aug 2013 #39
All the periods you mention saw a decline in birth rates. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #49
more garbage without a scintilla of evidence to back up your silly claims cali Aug 2013 #63
I tend to have a fairly accepting attitude towards most human behavior. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #66
we must help them feel that having kids is a bad idea. loyalsister Aug 2013 #74
Based on the fact that the whole human species is probably 100x into overshoot. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #75
ack. you are wrong. cali Aug 2013 #77
I actually don't think that any amount of human preaching will get people to change their behavior. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #86
I don't disagree with that. cali Aug 2013 #101
My wording was deliberately inflammatory. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #103
you deliberately post flame bait, make a claim cali Aug 2013 #108
Fair enough. I won't do it again. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #112
thanks. I think you bring up valid points and it's a discussion worthy topic cali Aug 2013 #117
I'll think about it. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #123
Somebody fucked you up real good, didn't they. WilliamPitt Aug 2013 #57
Why, because I have attitudes you don't agree with? GliderGuider Aug 2013 #61
No, but apparently I'm "completely bound up in my own psychic wounds and egoic needs." WilliamPitt Aug 2013 #64
That's quite an intense statement. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #67
Yup. WilliamPitt Aug 2013 #70
That's too bad. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #76
"our culture markets demographic beliefs and turns them into holy writ" get the red out Aug 2013 #135
We evolved to accept stupid beliefs in the interests of social harmony. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #137
Sometimes I wish I could accept them get the red out Aug 2013 #138
Some bells can't be un-rung GliderGuider Aug 2013 #140
The Chinese ferociously marketed "one child max" mainer Aug 2013 #147
The government, not their culture get the red out Aug 2013 #149
So we must wipe out "the culture"? mainer Aug 2013 #150
That is my take on how a culture markets things get the red out Aug 2013 #155
And where do the corporations come from? GliderGuider Aug 2013 #166
I agree get the red out Aug 2013 #167
All life is fundamentally selfish. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #168
You can not separate our society from the politics of corporatism. WCLinolVir Aug 2013 #178
Yes, people are fundamentally coerced. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #179
Nice theory but once again all encompassing. Over broad. WCLinolVir Aug 2013 #194
If you say so. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #195
People can't live in groups without a culture emerging. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #161
Your thoughts may be one thing Marrah_G Aug 2013 #151
Yes, I got that. nt GliderGuider Aug 2013 #153
Completely unrelated nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #91
Thats' a very good point. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #93
My sis has yet to post one picture of her now 10 and 8 year olds nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #98
Well if you are pipi_k Aug 2013 #107
Well, we have been told this by SD police agencies nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #109
Livia Soprano, is that you? nt Tommy_Carcetti Aug 2013 #165
They use a pic of Cameron Diaz as an example. pintobean Aug 2013 #8
In addition... Orrex Aug 2013 #9
Actually, yes, she is. nt justiceischeap Aug 2013 #16
How fucking ridiculous. Speaking of idiots. cali Aug 2013 #11
I would also add societal pressure into the mix of variables In some societal segments womens' roles KittyWampus Aug 2013 #29
You are right - there are so many other variables. Chemisse Aug 2013 #183
Perhaps smarter, better-educated people can see the future more clearly? GliderGuider Aug 2013 #13
"smarter, better-educated people" pintobean Aug 2013 #23
There are a growing number of people who don't think the problems are solvable any more. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #46
Funny that isn't it Puzzledtraveller Aug 2013 #73
Regarding our offspring solving future problems, do you know "Sevareid's Law?" GliderGuider Aug 2013 #78
Yet, here we are pintobean Aug 2013 #89
What problem do you see me as trying to solve? GliderGuider Aug 2013 #90
My need for an education in bullshit. (nt) pintobean Aug 2013 #94
I can't teach you anything you don't want to learn. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #97
Not at all. Daemonaquila Aug 2013 #188
I'm sure glad I'm not smart enough to see the world as you do. Throd Aug 2013 #30
Once you get used to it, it's actually quite a wonderful place. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #53
This kind of "monster"? onenote Aug 2013 #42
IMO, any couple entering their reproductive phase now who has more than two children GliderGuider Aug 2013 #50
Be careful. I mentioned that I was going to put a "two is enough" bumper sticker on my car, and... Dawgs Aug 2013 #92
I know. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #95
enjoy your superiority complex. I'm done with this idiotic thread. liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #162
That places Darwinian pressure on humans to become less intelligent. N/T GreenStormCloud Aug 2013 #15
That pressure has actually been there for a long time now. Jackpine Radical Aug 2013 #38
That is true. N/T GreenStormCloud Aug 2013 #40
It may go back much further than that. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #58
Well, not really. IIRC, intelligence as measured by IQ tests is only weakly inheritable. Nay Aug 2013 #141
Not a surprise. Myrina Aug 2013 #20
You alone here, got it! I thought it seemed simple and obvious enough. bettyellen Aug 2013 #31
+1 JustAnotherGen Aug 2013 #32
Seems an obvious confound, but....... freeplessinseattle Aug 2013 #120
How did he measure "smartness"? mainer Aug 2013 #172
Ask your mother. panader0 Aug 2013 #21
! hedgehog Aug 2013 #56
Perhaps women w/higher IQ's reason through options when unwanted pregnancy occurs AND KittyWampus Aug 2013 #27
Probably because they have more to lose, and the ability to evaluate that loss Xithras Aug 2013 #41
IQ is overrated. nt rrneck Aug 2013 #43
Makes sense to me. bunnies Aug 2013 #44
LOL. Daemonaquila Aug 2013 #189
I wish Bunnahabhain Aug 2013 #45
Not surprising to me, kiva Aug 2013 #47
Well that explains me, lol. Still childless, and have not regretted it. kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #51
I think there may be pipi_k Aug 2013 #52
Kanasawa also posted on his blog that black women are less attractive Gormy Cuss Aug 2013 #59
Since reliable birth control came along, MANY childbearing-age women SoCalDem Aug 2013 #60
All the ramifications of this are a huge can of worms from the standpoint of natural selection Zorra Aug 2013 #62
oh bullshit. correlation not causation. HiPointDem Aug 2013 #65
Calling Sir Francis Galton on the Factophone: Manifestor_of_Light Aug 2013 #69
You have discovered the bane of every baseball agents' existence AngryAmish Aug 2013 #193
Oy vey Puzzledtraveller Aug 2013 #71
It always amuses me when people critique an activity that is literally built into our DNA Dreamer Tatum Aug 2013 #72
First, I'm a monster for being an omnivore and now my mom's an idiot for getting pregnant. eom millennialmax Aug 2013 #82
^^this^^ Puzzledtraveller Aug 2013 #83
Well, people certainly try to shame others into it get the red out Aug 2013 #148
Wait a minute shenmue Aug 2013 #79
Or pensions. nt Dreamer Tatum Aug 2013 #80
Holy shit, imagine how many kids I'd have had if my IQ was 100 laundry_queen Aug 2013 #81
Yet 57% women with university degrees have children mainer Aug 2013 #84
Having a degree does not make you smart. There's a big difference. Dawgs Aug 2013 #96
Well, exactly! But that's the metric the study used mainer Aug 2013 #99
Regardless, having a child these days is not smart. It's a thoughtless, and sometimes selfish, act. Dawgs Aug 2013 #119
Having a child is not necessarily "thoughtless" mainer Aug 2013 #125
How old are your children, because I'm probably not talking about you? Dawgs Aug 2013 #129
I'm 60, and I have a wonderful career mainer Aug 2013 #130
Okay, so you're decision was 30 years ago. My initial comment was regarding present day. n/t Dawgs Aug 2013 #131
30 years ago, I knew Paul Ehrlich mainer Aug 2013 #145
Except the world is in much dire straits now. Dawgs Aug 2013 #181
Every generation thinks the world is in dire straits mainer Aug 2013 #185
We are humans. We have emotions. We are not robots. If you don't want to have children that's liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #143
I think that may be what helped prompt the idea for the study, but freeplessinseattle Aug 2013 #121
Unless they actually measured IQ, which I doubt, they're using college as their metric mainer Aug 2013 #122
Maybe it all has to do with marital status? mainer Aug 2013 #85
arrogance and self righteousness seem to increase with IQ. liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #88
And there is no arrogance or self-righteousness kiva Aug 2013 #102
I honestly find that less-smart types tend to be FAR more arrogant and self-righteous anneboleyn Aug 2013 #110
If you are saying MDs are not arrogant then you don't know many surgeons AngryAmish Aug 2013 #118
It's not an either/or thing though, thanks be REP Aug 2013 #111
I've seen plenty of arrogant, self righteous people right here on DU. liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #127
I prefer that to homophobes, racists, anti-abortnoids, etc personally REP Aug 2013 #142
Neither is acceptable to me. liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #146
I don't mind the unmarried, the childfree, or the areligious REP Aug 2013 #152
You don't think the article in the OP has an agenda? liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #157
You mean push choices like saying kiva Aug 2013 #180
Or "you'll change your mind" or "you're just selfish!" or ad infitnitum REP Aug 2013 #182
The first one always makes me want to say, kiva Aug 2013 #184
It always makes me want to point out there's no history of Alzheimer's in my family. REP Aug 2013 #186
It's a discussion that needs to take place. kiva Aug 2013 #187
Definitions please get the red out Aug 2013 #160
As a mother.. all I can say is... sigh.. Peacetrain Aug 2013 #104
What kind of idiot publication posts an article with that headline? Hekate Aug 2013 #105
I'm 52, and I will be lucky Politicalboi Aug 2013 #113
Well, that explains why I still have no urge at age 41 lol freeplessinseattle Aug 2013 #116
These are women with the potential for big adventurous interesting lives. ananda Aug 2013 #124
I've had a big, adventurous, interesting life mainer Aug 2013 #128
Being a mom is a great adventure, and being a mom does not mean that is all you will liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #132
As a career woman, I think that being a mom is the greatest adventure of all mainer Aug 2013 #175
I'm wondering... Oilwellian Aug 2013 #126
Whoever wrote this article is an idiot. It makes it sound as if there's nothing between raccoon Aug 2013 #136
Excellent point get the red out Aug 2013 #156
Maybe it could mean that women with a higher IQ only care about themselves where as women with GalaxyHunter Aug 2013 #144
Does having a career = selfish? get the red out Aug 2013 #154
I understand there are some who just don't simply want to have children. GalaxyHunter Aug 2013 #159
And that could be argued against get the red out Aug 2013 #163
I agree GalaxyHunter Aug 2013 #164
You guys realize your giving RWers proof of "liberal snobbery"? AZ Progressive Aug 2013 #169
I'm not even sure they're justified calling it "higher IQs" mainer Aug 2013 #171
Do you really think that will make any difference? It's like the President pissing away his first Egalitarian Thug Aug 2013 #190
I disagree. pintobean Aug 2013 #192
If you don't want children, don't have children mainer Aug 2013 #173
Informed choice is important felix_numinous Aug 2013 #174
At age eight I predicted I would not have children. WCLinolVir Aug 2013 #176
Dunno about babies but inflammatory titles sure are... Sotf Aug 2013 #191
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are Babies for Idiots? Ma...»Reply #28