Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Tue Aug 13, 2013, 07:43 AM Aug 2013

Obama Seems Lost in the 'War on Terror' [View all]

http://www.thenation.com/blog/175709/obama-seems-lost-war-terror#axzz2bqddiFuC


A fully armed MQ-9 Reaper unmanned aerial vehicle taxis down the runway at an air base in Afghanistan. (AP Photo/US Air Force, Staff Sgt. Brian Ferguson)

It ought to be pretty clear that President Obama doesn’t have the slightest clue about what to do about terrorism and radical Islam.

How else to explain why the United States, after saying that Al Qaeda is pretty much dead and buried, closed nearly twenty embassies around the world last week after US intelligence agencies intercepted a single message from the leader of Al Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahiri, in Pakistan to the leader of Al Qaeda in Yemen? And then, making things worse, the United States unleashed an unprecedented barrage of terrorist-creating drone strikes against targets in Yemen? And, finally, with allied branches of Al Qaeda in both Syria and Iraq, the United States is offering to help Iraq’s government battle the group—which is setting off waves of suicide bombs that kill hundreds—while, at the same time, supporting the same Al Qaeda group in Syria?

The New York Times, in reporting on the Yemen drone strikes—which, it notes, in the past have “set off a major public backlash against the United States”—points out that the strikes have been targeting mid-level radicals, not its leaders and not necessarily anyone plotting any attacks against US targets:

Senior American intelligence officials said last week that none of the about three dozen militants killed so far in the drone strikes were “household names,” meaning top-tier leaders of the affiliate, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. But the American official said the strikes had targeted “rising stars” in the Yemen network, people who were more likely to be moving around and vulnerable to attack. “They may not be big names now,” the official said, “but these were the guys that would have been future leaders.”
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The author can't understand how AQ could have been weakened but still pose a threat JaneyVee Aug 2013 #1
“They may not be big names now,” the official said, “but these were the guys that would have been djean111 Aug 2013 #2
It's not that simplistic either. Skidmore Aug 2013 #3
k/r marmar Aug 2013 #4
The author seems lost...Obama is playing offense BeyondGeography Aug 2013 #5
Good article Harmony Blue Aug 2013 #6
Everything is going according to plan. usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #7
Maybe they are killing mid-level people because they've already killed all the Number 2's. 1-Old-Man Aug 2013 #8
So now the assassination target lists include future political enemies? Coyotl Aug 2013 #9
We won't win the war on terra until we kill the children of potential terrorists. progressoid Aug 2013 #10
We won't win the war on political enemies until we quit making political enemies! Coyotl Aug 2013 #12
The idea is that you kill the true activists, all the while your informants are rising Jesus Malverde Aug 2013 #17
He seems pretty lost in all areas, except making Wall Street happy. Safetykitten Aug 2013 #11
Who are the real terrorists? RC Aug 2013 #13
Oh, there is a way to fight the drones Coyotl Aug 2013 #20
Cheep tourist flights from Yemen to US or wherever, you know, like loss leader flights to RC Aug 2013 #22
"while, at the same time, supporting the same Al Qaeda group in Syria? " Jesus Malverde Aug 2013 #14
Not lost at all Soundman Aug 2013 #15
Because there is no war on terror KarKar Aug 2013 #16
There most certainly is a war on terror and terrorist. Coyotl Aug 2013 #21
You go ahead and believe that bunk. KarKar Aug 2013 #23
Calling Obama a liar can be viewed as bunk a lot easier than negating the war on terror. Coyotl Aug 2013 #28
DURec leftstreet Aug 2013 #18
Perpetual war is the economic plan. mick063 Aug 2013 #19
The President surely knows any perceived weakness in national defense and/or softness in the war indepat Aug 2013 #24
Were we as a party to take the la-dee-da attitude of most of the people in this thread BeyondGeography Aug 2013 #27
The whole "War on Terror" is nothing but a sham jasond54231 Aug 2013 #25
"War on Terror" was a joke when Bush was president burnodo Aug 2013 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama Seems Lost in the '...