Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
33. Media, Propaganda and Vietnam
Thu Sep 5, 2013, 06:23 PM
Sep 2013

by Anup Shah
This Page Last Updated Friday, October 24, 2003

The “official” or commonly accepted version of how and why the U.S. was involved in Vietnam sort of goes along the following lines:

* Non-communist South Vietnam was invaded by communist North Vietnam
* The United States came to the aid of the regime in the South.
* The regime in the South was democratic


Yet, it turns out that this is untrue, and it required massive propaganda to create this standard and accepted image.

A lot of the following is a summary of part of journalist John Pilger’s book, Heroes, (Jonathan Cape 1986, Vintage 2001), mainly chapters 15 and 20, mostly written in the 1980s (and reprinted in 2001, from which the citations are taken. Where page numbers are cited in parenthesis, it is from this book unless indicated otherwise). He was in Vietnam many times, during the war, and returned on various occassions as well. He received a number of awards for his Vietnam reporting. He has generally been quite critical in his writings about power and authority.

Pilger described some studies in the 1980s where some people by then had already forgotten some of the reasons for the Vietnam war, and that “More than a third could not say which side American had supported and some believed that North Vietnam had been ‘our allies’” (p. 178.) He describes why this “historical amnesia” might occur:

"This 'historical amnesia' is not accidental; if anything it demonstrates the insidious power of the dominant propaganda of the Vietnam war. The constant American government line was that the war was essentially a conflict of Vietnamese against Vietnamese, in which Americans became 'involved', mistakenly and honourably. This assumption was shared both by 'hawks' and 'doves'; it permeated the media coverage during the war and has been the overriding theme of numerous retrospectives since the war. It is a false and frequently dishonest assumption. The longest war this century was a war waged by America against Vietnam, North and South. It was an attack on the people of Vietnam, communist and non-communist, by American forces. It was an invasion of their homeland and their lives, just as the current presence in Afghanistan of Soviet forces is an invasion. Neither began as a mistake."

— John Pilger, Heroes, (Jonathan Cape 1986, Vintage 2001), p.178 (Emphasis is original)


CONTINUED (one heckuva resource)...

http://www.globalissues.org/article/402/media-propaganda-and-vietnam

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It always should be peace first, Octafish. Always. nt Mnemosyne Sep 2013 #1
Absolutely peace first. When we're the strongest nation in history... Octafish Sep 2013 #3
I absolutely love it when you "get all didactic"! It spreads knowledge every time. Mnemosyne Sep 2013 #20
Warfuckingmongers malaise Sep 2013 #26
JFK upon hearing news his friend Lumumba had been assassinated... Octafish Sep 2013 #27
Any smart rational person already knows that the "Gulf of Tonkin" incident Drale Sep 2013 #2
I'd bet you're in the minority. Octafish Sep 2013 #4
I am one teacher who brings this up in class. iemitsu Sep 2013 #19
I think many knew it was a lie. malthaussen Sep 2013 #28
Yes, that's why it was called an "illegal war" from the get go. Waiting For Everyman Sep 2013 #6
As a loyal American, I must point out how you consistently "forget" truedelphi Sep 2013 #5
NSA boss has got more power than any one person has held in US history... Octafish Sep 2013 #8
Much of that is not old stuff for me. Thanks for all the info - truedelphi Sep 2013 #9
God forbid the NSA is 'uncomfortable' felix_numinous Sep 2013 #7
Are you Robert McKee? Octafish Sep 2013 #21
No, thank you though felix_numinous Sep 2013 #25
Goddamn I thought this was pro-war satire at first. AtheistCrusader Sep 2013 #10
I thought it was an Onion article. nt awoke_in_2003 Sep 2013 #12
Wink...wink...wink Supersedeas Sep 2013 #31
I thought this might have been the Onion.. awoke_in_2003 Sep 2013 #11
BFEE script plays Groundhog Day without the happy ending. Octafish Sep 2013 #22
Savak was trained felix_numinous Sep 2013 #29
"Analysts Made 'SIGINT fit the claim'" sounds a lot like: johnnyreb Sep 2013 #13
Lock Them Up. Octafish Sep 2013 #32
K & R !!! WillyT Sep 2013 #14
Media, Propaganda and Vietnam Octafish Sep 2013 #33
As it fucking should gopiscrap Sep 2013 #15
I have been corrected here on DU for stating WHEN CRABS ROAR Sep 2013 #18
Nixon pulled a Bush on Eisenhower... Octafish Sep 2013 #35
Trust me I have pictures of me as a 7 year old gopiscrap Sep 2013 #38
From John Pilger... Octafish Sep 2013 #34
Hey no problem, my honor gopiscrap Sep 2013 #37
Nixon was ''supposed'' to succeed Eisenhower and Vietnam... Octafish Sep 2013 #39
Interesting how the NSA is central to suffragette Sep 2013 #16
Secret Government is un-American Octafish Sep 2013 #30
Yes, those who control the secrets get their way suffragette Sep 2013 #42
I could write a book coldbeer Sep 2013 #17
More from John Pilger... Octafish Sep 2013 #36
I find it interesting that they called it "shoe" Aerows Sep 2013 #41
From Senator Leahy's speech against the IWR on the eve of the vote: cali Sep 2013 #23
Thank you, cali! Here's another voice we sorely miss today... Octafish Sep 2013 #40
The NSA's Panopticon society Ichingcarpenter Sep 2013 #24
K&R + more truth to fuel those "uncomfortable comparisons" bobthedrummer Sep 2013 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NSA bosses feared releasi...»Reply #33