Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: TIRED of INEQUALITY? Get used to it. Things look like they're only gonna get worse. [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)47. Truth is what Democracy craves.
Which is why pukes and billionaires spend so much money on hiding it.
The Propaganda System That Has Helped Create a Permanent Overclass Is Over a Century in the Making
Pulling back the curtain on how intent the wealthiest Americans have been on establishing a propaganda tool to subvert democracy.
Wednesday, 17 April 2013 00:00
By Andrew Gavin Marshall, AlterNet | News Analysis
Where there is the possibility of democracy, there is the inevitability of elite insecurity. All through its history, democracy has been under a sustained attack by elite interests, political, economic, and cultural. There is a simple reason for this: democracy as in true democracy places power with people. In such circumstances, the few who hold power become threatened. With technological changes in modern history, with literacy and education, mass communication, organization and activism, elites have had to react to the changing nature of society locally and globally.
From the late 19th century on, the threats to elite interests from the possibility of true democracy mobilized institutions, ideologies, and individuals in support of power. What began was a massive social engineering project with one objective: control. Through educational institutions, the social sciences, philanthropic foundations, public relations and advertising agencies, corporations, banks, and states, powerful interests sought to reform and protect their power from the potential of popular democracy.
SNIP...
The development of psychology, psychoanalysis, and other disciplines increasingly portrayed the public and the population as irrational beings incapable of making their own decisions. The premise was simple: if the population was driven by dangerous, irrational emotions, they needed to be kept out of power and ruled over by those who were driven by reason and rationality, naturally, those who were already in power.
The Princeton Radio Project, which began in the 1930s with Rockefeller Foundation funding, brought together many psychologists, social scientists, and experts armed with an interest in social control, mass communication, and propaganda. The Princeton Radio Project had a profound influence upon the development of a modern "democratic propaganda" in the United States and elsewhere in the industrialized world. It helped in establishing and nurturing the ideas, institutions, and individuals who would come to shape Americas democratic propaganda throughout the Cold War, a program fostered between the private corporations which own the media, advertising, marketing, and public relations industries, and the state itself.
CONTINUED...
http://truth-out.org/news/item/15784-the-propaganda-system-that-has-helped-create-a-permanent-overclass-is-over-a-century-in-the-making
Thankfully, to help spread light when the protectors of the First Amendment won't, Maria Galardin's TUC (Time of Useful Consciousness) Radio. The podcast helps explain how we got here and what we need to do to move forward, starting with putting the "Public" into Airwaves again:
Alex Carey: Corporations and Propaganda
The Attack on Democracy
The 20th century, said Carey, is marked by three historic developments: the growth of democracy via the expansion of the franchise, the growth of corporations, and the growth of propaganda to protect corporations from democracy. Carey wrote that the people of the US have been subjected to an unparalleled, expensive, 3/4 century long propaganda effort designed to expand corporate rights by undermining democracy and destroying the unions. And, in his manuscript, unpublished during his life time, he described that history, going back to World War I and ending with the Reagan era. Carey covers the little known role of the US Chamber of Commerce in the McCarthy witch hunts of post WWII and shows how the continued campaign against "Big Government" plays an important role in bringing Reagan to power.
John Pilger called Carey "a second Orwell", Noam Chomsky dedicated his book, Manufacturing Consent, to him. And even though TUC Radio runs our documentary based on Carey's manuscript at least every two years and draws a huge response each time, Alex Carey is still unknown.
Given today's spotlight on corporations that may change. It is not only the Occupy movement that inspired me to present this program again at this time. By an amazing historic coincidence Bill Moyers and Charlie Cray of Greenpeace have just added the missing chapter to Carey's analysis. Carey's manuscript ends in 1988 when he committed suicide. Moyers and Cray begin with 1971 and bring the corporate propaganda project up to date.
This is a fairly complex production with many voices, historic sound clips, and source material. The program has been used by writers and students of history and propaganda. Alex Carey: Taking the Risk out of Democracy, Corporate Propaganda VS Freedom and Liberty with a foreword by Noam Chomsky was published by the University of Illinois Press in 1995.
SOURCE: http://tucradio.org/new.html
If you find a moment, here's the first part (scroll down at the link for the second part) on Carey.
http://tucradio.org/AlexCarey_ONE.mp3
Here's an excellent overview from a guy who pointed out some important truth and was shot dead outside Richard Mellon Scaife's office one day, a "suicide" right.
The Origins of the Overclass
By Steve Kangas
The wealthy have always used many methods to accumulate wealth, but it was not until the mid-1970s that these methods coalesced into a superbly organized, cohesive and efficient machine. After 1975, it became greater than the sum of its parts, a smooth flowing organization of advocacy groups, lobbyists, think tanks, conservative foundations, and PR firms that hurtled the richest 1 percent into the stratosphere.
The origins of this machine, interestingly enough, can be traced back to the CIA. This is not to say the machine is a formal CIA operation, complete with code name and signed documents. (Although such evidence may yet surface and previously unthinkable domestic operations such as MK-ULTRA, CHAOS and MOCKINGBIRD show this to be a distinct possibility.) But what we do know already indicts the CIA strongly enough. Its principle creators were Irving Kristol, Paul Weyrich, William Simon, Richard Mellon Scaife, Frank Shakespeare, William F. Buckley, Jr., the Rockefeller family, and more. Almost all the machine's creators had CIA backgrounds.
During the 1970s, these men would take the propaganda and operational techniques they had learned in the Cold War and apply them to the Class War. Therefore it is no surprise that the American version of the machine bears an uncanny resemblance to the foreign versions designed to fight communism. The CIA's expert and comprehensive organization of the business class would succeed beyond their wildest dreams. In 1975, the richest 1 percent owned 22 percent of Americas wealth. By 1992, they would nearly double that, to 42 percent the highest level of inequality in the 20th century.
How did this alliance start? The CIA has always recruited the nations elite: millionaire businessmen, Wall Street brokers, members of the national news media, and Ivy League scholars. During World War II, General "Wild Bill" Donovan became chief of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA. Donovan recruited so exclusively from the nations rich and powerful that members eventually came to joke that "OSS" stood for "Oh, so social!"
Another early elite was Allen Dulles, who served as Director of the CIA from 1953 to 1961. Dulles was a senior partner at the Wall Street firm of Sullivan and Cromwell, which represented the Rockefeller empire and other mammoth trusts, corporations and cartels. He was also a board member of the J. Henry Schroeder Bank, with offices in Wall Street, London, Zurich and Hamburg. His financial interests across the world would become a conflict of interest when he became head of the CIA. Like Donavan, he would recruit exclusively from societys elite.
CONTINUED...
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-overclass.html
Thanks, mick063. They have all most of the money and guns. We got something better -- the truth.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

TIRED of INEQUALITY? Get used to it. Things look like they're only gonna get worse. [View all]
Octafish
Sep 2013
OP
Jeff Greene(who ran for Senate in Florida in 2010) put it in politically incorrect terms.
Dawson Leery
Sep 2013
#1
After 30+ years, I officially quit listening to NPR news for good about a week ago
corkhead
Sep 2013
#52
I stopped listening in the early 1990s, late 1980s. The voice tone told me everything I needed to
JDPriestly
Sep 2013
#71
"I remember when Democrats actually used government to level the playing field ...
CrispyQ
Sep 2013
#43
Heard it this morn too but just got on and saw your excellent OP. HUGE K&R nt
riderinthestorm
Sep 2013
#4
Without question the highest level of condescension this side of Glenn Hubbard . . .
hatrack
Sep 2013
#86
A conversation I had with a schoolteacher friend in MN stated that kids are acting more self centered
adirondacker
Sep 2013
#31
Is this defeatism? he's conceding the fight altogether? for whom is he conceding?
99th_Monkey
Sep 2013
#8
It's so obvious - we need a New New Deal, this time with guaranteed minimum income for all.
reformist2
Sep 2013
#12
I don't give Reagan much credit, his "handlers" had a lot of the ideas, but I do not think they had
Dustlawyer
Sep 2013
#15
I think we blame too much on the right-wing. The 1% isnt right or left they are power.
rhett o rick
Sep 2013
#45
They want a world where the ONLY way to make it is to kiss their ass for a few crumbs.
Spitfire of ATJ
Sep 2013
#26
A lot of us were already stupid enough that we didn't make it a crime to lie and call it news.
FiveGoodMen
Sep 2013
#57
This vid should go viral, but at six and a half minutes, I guess it's too long for most people.
CrispyQ
Sep 2013
#42
And the nitwits among us obsess over trashing Greenwald. They cant discuss the intelligence
rhett o rick
Sep 2013
#46
Tell me that those that obsess over Greenwald arent trying to deflect attention from other
rhett o rick
Sep 2013
#63
Nobody is "obsessing over Greenwald", other than hacks who continue to target him with smears.
Maedhros
Sep 2013
#69
It is possible that I'm a bit over-reactive when it comes to this particular issue.
Maedhros
Sep 2013
#78
Ooh, just what we need: a country full of impoverished people with a lot of guns.
winter is coming
Sep 2013
#50
for profit prisons can take millions more as all those angry people break laws, their lobby wrote.
Sunlei
Sep 2013
#58
Maybe it's time for the young generation to think about leaving the country to find
Vashta Nerada
Sep 2013
#51
The RIGHTward move this country has taken in 35 years on nearly ALL fronts is KILLING us.
HughBeaumont
Sep 2013
#55
this could change if gov would cut the barriers that prevent people from working out of their homes.
Sunlei
Sep 2013
#56
How about Liberal Democrats? They're infinitely better than the Wall Street lubbers.
Octafish
Sep 2013
#89
Please, write an OP. Meanwhile, the Banksters who destroyed the American middle class...
Octafish
Sep 2013
#84
In boosting the ''size'' at the top of the pyramid from 1- to 15-percent he added a lot of Hopium.
Octafish
Sep 2013
#87
10% of NPR employees are going to be looking for other jobs-the airwaves belong to the people-right?
bobthedrummer
Sep 2013
#93