Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Fukushima radioactive waters to hit US any day now [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(104,331 posts)31. And here's what Woods Hole has to say:
Within months of the accident, Ken Buesseler, a senior scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), assembled a research cruise and science party of 17 people from eight institutions to sample the waters surrounding the nuclear plant. The scientists found elevated levels of the nuclear by-product cesium but they were below the threshold of concern for direct human exposure. The levels of cesium had diminished quickly off shore because cesium is soluble in seawater and was therefore diluted by the Pacific ocean currents. They also measured cesium and other radionuclides in plankton and fish and, in subsequent cruises, collected sediments from the seafloor near the plant. To this date, important fisheries off Fukushima remain closed due to levels of cesium that are above Japanese limits for seafood.
http://www.whoi.edu/main/topic/fukushima-radiation
http://www.whoi.edu/main/topic/fukushima-radiation
So the levels are below concern for humans in the waters surrounding the plant. That's before they're further diluted by passage across the Pacific.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I noticed you skipped an important part of the 1st sentence: But is likely to be harmless
uppityperson
Oct 2013
#2
Can't do scaremongering and say "likely to be harmless" at the same time...nt
SidDithers
Oct 2013
#3
Not attacking you, just trying to figure out what you mean. Your linked article says "harmless" and
uppityperson
Oct 2013
#9
Hello. Would you please answer, seeking clarification here. I won't insult or attack, just
uppityperson
Oct 2013
#18
"He is so over-the-top about it that he has been banned from the Environment and Energy group."
zappaman
Oct 2013
#24
Not all ionizing radiation is the same. Alpha and beta particles are easily shielded against.
Gravitycollapse
Oct 2013
#13
What I've read about the sea stars is local overpopulation leading to fast disease transmission,
uppityperson
Oct 2013
#53
If you want some 'science': debris floats, so part of it is above the surface
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2013
#71
Maybe the starfish deaths along the Northwest coast are related to it?
Baitball Blogger
Oct 2013
#43