Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Holder spells out why drones target US citizens [View all]
http://www.kqed.org/news/story/2012/03/05/86841/holder_spells_out_why_drones_target_us_citizens?source=npr&category=u.sHolder Spells Out Why Drones Target U.S. Citizens
by Carrie Johnson | March 5, 2012 9:03 PM
It's one of the most serious actions the U.S. government could ever take: targeting one of its own citizens with lethal force.
Since last year, U.S. drones have killed three Americans overseas. But Attorney General Eric Holder says the ongoing fight against al-Qaida means those kinds of deadly strikes are now a way of life. And judging from the reaction to his national security speech at Northwestern University Law School on Monday, so is the hot debate over the legality of the U.S. drone program.
Since President Obama took office, he's deployed drones against terrorism suspects in an unprecedented way. But the program is covert, so although foreign governments and reporters have chronicled those strikes, no U.S. official is supposed to mention them directly. Instead, as Holder acknowledged, they use euphemisms like targeted killing or use of force.
....
"They are claiming the authority to kill any American citizen whom the president deems to be an enemy of the state," Jaffer says, "and that authority is not reviewable before the fact by any court and it's not reviewed after the fact by any court."
...
They'll remain hidden from view, Waxman says, because that's the nature of the modern fight against terrorism, which clashes with Obama's promise of transparency.
Source: NPR
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
37 replies, 4610 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (28)
ReplyReply to this post
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rush Limbaugh's 20+ years of hate filled demagoguery has only helped bring this about.
Uncle Joe
Mar 2012
#16
No, actually I said that when such a killing occurs there has to be proof that it was
sabrina 1
Mar 2012
#30
"The police have the authority to shoot and kill a dangerous suspect without giving him a trial"
Downtown Hound
Mar 2012
#18
So you're saying that a Seal team can get in close enough to kill him but not bring him in?
Downtown Hound
Mar 2012
#33
There were charges against Bin Laden. What were the charges against Al Awlaki and
sabrina 1
Mar 2012
#31
Hey Holder, do the world a big favor and take a big bite out of an African bee hive. n/t
Downtown Hound
Mar 2012
#14
Actually 23 hour lockdown is only used for prisoners that have broken rules
Downtown Hound
Mar 2012
#35
He left out the part about "looking tough" in an election trumps the constitution.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2012
#27