Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

randome

(34,845 posts)

6. I hear you. It would be interesting to hear Obama's reluctance to agree to something like this.

Reply to FarCenter (Reply #5)

Sat Oct 26, 2013, 10:15 AM

Oct 2013

I would think there is a rationale behind it. Not something that everyone would support but something that would make logical sense other than 'we want to keep spying'.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'We can't defend ourselves against the NSA' [View all] FarCenter Oct 2013 OP

That's what Frank Church said. Octafish Oct 2013 #1

Art Buchwald too? nt bananas Nov 2013 #7

So...no more technology because 'capabilities' might exist? randome Oct 2013 #2

There is also this --- FarCenter Oct 2013 #3

I truly don't want to be an NSA booster but... randome Oct 2013 #4

If a foreign corporation does something illegal in the US, we should enforce our laws here FarCenter Oct 2013 #5

I hear you. It would be interesting to hear Obama's reluctance to agree to something like this. randome Oct 2013 #6