Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

yup zappaman Oct 2013 #1
All they have to do is make sure that every fragment of evidence has been released to the public JDPriestly Oct 2013 #76
Was it ever explained why Ruby shot Oswald? KansDem Oct 2013 #87
Ruby's cryptic response... MinM Oct 2013 #91
What is the question he answers... Whiskeytide Oct 2013 #166
At 0'28" KansDem Oct 2013 #216
Thanks. n/t Whiskeytide Oct 2013 #218
Thanks... KansDem Oct 2013 #217
Yes. In Texas. That's why people are not happy with the conclusions of the Warren Report. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #148
When's the last time you read the Warren Report? stopbush Oct 2013 #133
When did you last read it? JDPriestly Oct 2013 #147
Two years ago. stopbush Oct 2013 #151
I haven't read it. But you have inspired me to do so. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #170
Good for you. At least you're open minded. It's available online for free stopbush Oct 2013 #205
what is he selling a book warrior1 Oct 2013 #2
He supports secrets being kept, too RobertEarl Oct 2013 #4
Selling books is what JFK CT'ers do best cpwm17 Oct 2013 #5
I was in college when the assassination occurred. I remember it clearly. I am not happy JDPriestly Oct 2013 #77
And the vast majority of those who discount the Warren Report have never actually read it. stopbush Oct 2013 #135
More than lefties were shot, or shot at. GreenStormCloud Oct 2013 #177
Because he has tons of evidence and a humanly possible scenario on his side Schema Thing Oct 2013 #8
"fucking unicorns"!!!.... SidDithers Oct 2013 #38
How did Oswald get in and out of the Soviet Union during the height of the Cold War? KurtNYC Oct 2013 #96
Great questions Kurt... MinM Oct 2013 #124
Actually, Kurt, the WCR answers all of those questions, and in detail. stopbush Oct 2013 #136
what page or section? I find no mention of Ferrie or Ruby in the Oswald bio of WCR. KurtNYC Oct 2013 #146
That's the point. stopbush Oct 2013 #152
Someone in this exchange seems to think bullets have brakes and steering KurtNYC Oct 2013 #157
Someone seems to not know the definition of the word "pristine." stopbush Oct 2013 #206
Its not a theory its a single bullet fact. BootinUp Oct 2013 #208
The bullet looks like it was shot into cotton wadding. Octafish Oct 2013 #219
Similar looking bullets have been produced from experiments BootinUp Oct 2013 #222
No. Just on tee vee. Octafish Oct 2013 #223
Gee thanks BootinUp Oct 2013 #227
he went to the Soviet Union and was accepted just as we accepted dozens of grantcart Oct 2013 #153
Perhaps you either haven't read or have forgotten how Oswald got into the USSR. KurtNYC Oct 2013 #163
So you are or are not aware of how Oswald got into the USSR? grantcart Oct 2013 #167
"the last person picked by anyone for a high profile operation" unless you need a patsy perhaps. KurtNYC Oct 2013 #172
The RW did not believe that he was soft on Communism. GreenStormCloud Oct 2013 #183
There was no air cover for the Bay of Pigs invasion KurtNYC Oct 2013 #233
When a target is moving directly away, it is as if the target is standing still. GreenStormCloud Oct 2013 #179
Oswald was an accomplished marksman. Gravitycollapse Oct 2013 #185
Yes. He passed the Marines qualification standards to be a combat rifleman. GreenStormCloud Oct 2013 #190
I don't believe the official story, never will n/t doc03 Oct 2013 #3
Me either Shampoyeto Oct 2013 #178
There is a show on Reelz channel this Sunday at 8pm I beleive doc03 Oct 2013 #180
Neither did Sen. Richard Schweiker MinM Oct 2013 #181
Could be because the nitty gritty of the whole story has been under secrecy wraps since it happened. shraby Oct 2013 #6
CA Atty Gen Earl Warren provided racist rhetoric to Lt. Gen DeWitt, OnyxCollie Oct 2013 #7
He later said he: BootinUp Oct 2013 #9
Its funny that you call him a conspiracy entrepeneur BootinUp Oct 2013 #10
Conspiracy Theories by Sunstein & Vermeule. OnyxCollie Oct 2013 #12
I don't see anything there to support calling Earl Warren BootinUp Oct 2013 #14
There was nothing to support the internment of the Japanese OnyxCollie Oct 2013 #15
As he later regretted. You are not ignorant of that I assume? BootinUp Oct 2013 #16
As I had added to my first post, OnyxCollie Oct 2013 #17
Of course you also make this huge leap BootinUp Oct 2013 #20
Heres a decent attempt to explain Warren on Japanese Internment You probably aren't interested BootinUp Oct 2013 #23
Well, what does it say? OnyxCollie Oct 2013 #24
It puts things in context. BootinUp Oct 2013 #25
I'm not interested in reading a long article to see if you had a point. OnyxCollie Oct 2013 #29
Oh yeah, research like I just did, yeah. BootinUp Oct 2013 #32
And here is a link to the relevant part of BootinUp Oct 2013 #33
From Personal Justice Denied OnyxCollie Oct 2013 #35
You're insulting remarks have become boring and dull BootinUp Oct 2013 #44
My wife, a political science major in the early '50s, still vividly recalls one of her professors, indepat Oct 2013 #36
You should read Justice Douglas' notes. OnyxCollie Oct 2013 #37
The secret Notes? Your attempts at sliming Warren are really pathetic BootinUp Oct 2013 #55
Your tantrums are really pathetic. OnyxCollie Oct 2013 #68
The grassy knoll refuses to die. RC Oct 2013 #11
Magical thinking. A route change? Not really. stopbush Oct 2013 #138
The Key To The Warren Report |American Heritage BootinUp Oct 2013 #13
Nobody knows a fucking thing about Oswald. RagAss Oct 2013 #18
Clearly a silly statement on its face. Maybe what you mean to say BootinUp Oct 2013 #22
No...I meant what I said.... RagAss Oct 2013 #165
Bullshit Politicalboi Oct 2013 #19
LOL, the truth is boring I understand. But Oswald did it alone. n-t Logical Oct 2013 #49
The SS testified as to why they weren't on JFK's limo that day. stopbush Oct 2013 #139
How to tell a conspiracy theory is pure bullshit... Archae Oct 2013 #21
We as citizens couldn't handle the truth......its easier to swallow what we are told.... Good god Gin Oct 2013 #26
The truth may be that Oswald acted alone but many refuse to consider that. Kaleva Oct 2013 #28
The truth may be that Oswald didn't act alone, but many refuse to consider that. villager Oct 2013 #40
I read my first JFK conspiracy book in grade school BootinUp Oct 2013 #56
"Murder by Cartoon" villager Oct 2013 #57
Meyers responded to these claims apparently BootinUp Oct 2013 #59
Since you credit the HSCA then, I guess -- since you don't cherry pick, right? -- you agree villager Oct 2013 #60
I think they made a mistake with regards to using the acoustic BootinUp Oct 2013 #61
Of course you do. villager Oct 2013 #62
In your case, I gather your real problem with the official story BootinUp Oct 2013 #63
And I could sift through the other evidence that points to a conspiracy.... villager Oct 2013 #64
But why is the lone nut theory wobbly? BootinUp Oct 2013 #65
Let me turn the question around: Do you believe that all three major 60's assassinations were really villager Oct 2013 #66
I will try to answer that question BootinUp Oct 2013 #67
lol YoungDemCA Oct 2013 #213
That's, this will help me ignore your other posts! nt Logical Oct 2013 #122
Too bad that Hale Boggs who was on the Warren Commission and wanted to re-open an investigation AnotherMcIntosh Oct 2013 #27
Boggs was the most outspoken critic among the three dissenting members dflprincess Oct 2013 #45
The first odd thing was that the police, FBI, et al immediately knew that (1) Oswald was the shooter AnotherMcIntosh Oct 2013 #50
Another unexplainable thing was why the Secret Service agents were called off Nay Oct 2013 #79
Simple, they weren't called off. BootinUp Oct 2013 #83
It's on video. Last Stand Oct 2013 #169
See post #139 above BootinUp Oct 2013 #188
The puzzled "what the hell" gesture can be seen here: AnotherMcIntosh Oct 2013 #95
Well he was identified as the only employee who his employer was certain wasn't missing. grantcart Oct 2013 #154
Yep, stop looking for anyone else if an employer is reportedly missing one employee. Good call. AnotherMcIntosh Oct 2013 #155
You raised the question "how did the police know it was Oswald so quickly" grantcart Oct 2013 #156
Not true. Anyone can see the questions at #50: "How did they know that he was the only one involved? AnotherMcIntosh Oct 2013 #158
And I am dealing with the first question: grantcart Oct 2013 #159
At #156, you said I "raised the question 'how did the police know it was Oswald so quickly' AnotherMcIntosh Oct 2013 #160
So we are clear on this point: There is absolutely nothing unusual or mysterious grantcart Oct 2013 #161
What we are clear on is that you create strawmen and falsely attribute statements to others. AnotherMcIntosh Oct 2013 #162
I found your post ambiguous and am trying to understand exactly what it is you are alleging. grantcart Oct 2013 #164
Maybe he wasn't in a good mood? BootinUp Oct 2013 #200
Having doubts in the 60s and 70s, and now are two different things BootinUp Oct 2013 #53
I agree oswaldactedalone Oct 2013 #30
lol nt BootinUp Oct 2013 #31
The birth of conspiracy theories was a huge detriment to the intelligence of American society. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #34
The JFK CT BS was the precursor to birtherism n/t SamYeager Oct 2013 #52
CTs are older than JFK KamaAina Oct 2013 #111
I agree with you on this... YoungDemCA Oct 2013 #211
We all know it was George HW Bush... SidDithers Oct 2013 #39
heehee BootinUp Oct 2013 #42
Yeah. It's not like George Herbert Walker Bush wasn't in Dallas on November 22, 1963. Octafish Oct 2013 #71
Sid is soooo bad. greytdemocrat Oct 2013 #74
''Bite'' is the operative word. Octafish Oct 2013 #81
Why would Bush have to be in Dallas to be involved in the assassination? PAMod Oct 2013 #142
So, why not ask George Herbert Walker Bush? Octafish Oct 2013 #144
There you go, posting something logical in response to the CT'ers... YoungDemCA Oct 2013 #209
Tyler, Texas is not Dallas, Texas. It's not even all that close. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #212
So why did Gerald Ford have to alter the report? Octafish Oct 2013 #41
With more recent (last 15 years or so) analysis on the bullet path BootinUp Oct 2013 #43
Thanks, but all that makes assumptions and cherry-picks in order to buttress the Warren Commission. Octafish Oct 2013 #82
An independently certified 3D computer model says Mr. Griffith is very wrong. BootinUp Oct 2013 #84
Got a link to that? Octafish Oct 2013 #86
Sure! BootinUp Oct 2013 #186
"I Don't Think Lee Harvey Oswald Pulled the Trigger" Dale Myers MinM Oct 2013 #201
Take it up with the independent certifying party. nt BootinUp Oct 2013 #203
ABC News, the company Bill Casey rebuilt for the Company... Octafish Oct 2013 #220
A fine example of the genetic fallacy, Octafish Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #221
Your expert opionion, Bolo Boffin? What's not true in what I posted? Octafish Oct 2013 #224
None of that has anything to do with the video. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #225
Quit with the Sideshow, Bolo Boffin. When it comes to Dallas, CIA calls up its assets in the media. Octafish Oct 2013 #228
Another fine example of the genetic fallacy, Octafish. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #231
Jumping to that conclusion would be a logical fallacy. Octafish Oct 2013 #232
I know you didn't say outright that i am CIA. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #234
So why continue to say what I didn't say, Bolo Boffin? Octafish Oct 2013 #236
What have I said you said that you didn't? Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #237
''This self-martyrdom act of yours does get tiresome.'' Octafish Oct 2013 #239
Well, it does. What did I say you said that you didn't? n/t Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #240
Who cares? Octafish Oct 2013 #244
So you intend to keep climbing up on that cross, nailing yourself on, and wailing? Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #250
How much time do you have to dedicate yourself to a subthread on an old thread? Octafish Oct 2013 #255
What subthread on an old thread are you referring to? Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #262
Hours spent on this one. Octafish Oct 2013 #264
This thread? *scoff* Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #268
Really, Bolo Boffin? Octafish Oct 2013 #272
Really, Octafish. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #273
Really monitoring away. Octafish Oct 2013 #274
Maybe you should calm down. I'm not monitoring you. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #275
You say alter. I say more accurately describe. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #69
Either way, Ford lied. Octafish Oct 2013 #85
Bullshit he did. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #88
Why defend a puke liar, Bolo Boffin? And your question has nothing to do with the subject. Octafish Oct 2013 #89
What do you care about attacking Republicans, Octafish? Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #90
Got a link for any of that? Octafish Oct 2013 #92
It amazes me that you deny what you do in other threads, Octafish. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #93
No link to back up what you say. Here's a link from me: Octafish Oct 2013 #94
I just added the link to your posted article smearing Bobby Kennedy. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #97
Out of context, of course. Octafish Oct 2013 #99
The hell it is. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #101
Show where I smeared Bobby Kennedy, Bolo Boffin. Octafish Oct 2013 #103
Right here, Octafish. Third time's the charm? Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #105
Wow, Bolo Boffin. No where do I smear Robert Kennedy. So, there is that. Octafish Oct 2013 #109
That says RFK is an accessory to his brother's murder. It doesn't get more "smear" than that. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #110
Not what I wrote, Bolo Boffin. And yet you insist on saying that's what I wrote. Octafish Oct 2013 #116
Why did you post it here, Octafish? Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #119
More words you made up, Bolo Boffin. Octafish Oct 2013 #127
I didn't make you post that article here! Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #129
What's sad is you continue to smear me by alleging what I did not write, Bolo Boffin. Octafish Oct 2013 #131
You. Posted. That. Article. And. Refuse. To. Disavow. The. RFK. Smear. n/t Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #132
I didn't write what you said, though. Octafish Oct 2013 #145
Yes, you did. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #168
If you're willing to misrepresent what I write, what else do you misrepresent? Octafish Oct 2013 #173
Why can't you answer a simple question? zappaman Oct 2013 #175
I haven't misrepresented you. You posted that link that smeared Bobby Kennedy. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #176
Simple question. zappaman Oct 2013 #123
Why do you want fewer people to learn what happened to President Kennedy, zappaman? Octafish Oct 2013 #128
So you can't answer the question? zappaman Oct 2013 #134
Wow! Tag Team propaganda. Octafish Oct 2013 #143
You really do think Robert Kennedy was an accessory after the fact in his brother's murder. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #196
That's a propaganda technique. Octafish Oct 2013 #245
So you do not think RFK was an accessory to his brother's murder? Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #253
You bring up things I didn't say and try to make me use my time defending them. Octafish Oct 2013 #256
No, that's not what you think. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #260
Don't write things I didn't write, then. Octafish Oct 2013 #266
I haven't. n/t Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #269
So you post where I show how you cherry-pick a quote? Octafish Oct 2013 #98
Cherry pick??? It's an entire section of the article! Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #100
Why should I spend time fighting your straw man, Bolo Boffin? Octafish Oct 2013 #102
You linked to an article that smeared Bobby Kennedy. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #104
That's not what I wrote or what the article stated. Octafish Oct 2013 #106
You are wrong. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #107
So where did I smear Robert Kennedy, Bolo Boffin? Octafish Oct 2013 #113
When you posted the article that smears him. That's when you did it. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #115
So, I didn't say what you allege and I have to apologize? Octafish Oct 2013 #118
What doesn't escape me is your unwillingness to disavow the smear of RFK. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #120
WOW! zappaman Oct 2013 #114
Tag Team! Octafish Oct 2013 #117
It's not out of context at all zappaman Oct 2013 #121
Tag Team! Yay! Octafish Oct 2013 #125
You didn't answer the question, but you never do. zappaman Oct 2013 #126
Tag Team! Yay! What I wrote 10 years ago today... Octafish Oct 2013 #130
Here's also what you wrote earlier this year... zappaman Oct 2013 #137
Wow, zappaman. You're so wise, you're repeating the same thing twice. Octafish Oct 2013 #141
"Show where Oswald killed JFK or anyone..." Sure. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #195
So what? Bugliosi ignores what we've learned over the past 50 years. Octafish Oct 2013 #226
Bugliosi manifestly does not do that. Thompson's assertion is ludicrous. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #235
So now you don't like Bugliosi? Octafish Oct 2013 #238
I didn't say that, Octafish. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #241
Why should I answer your demands, Bolo Boffin? Octafish Oct 2013 #243
"demands" - you must mean my questions. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #247
I have, all up and down this thread. Octafish Oct 2013 #249
You posted an article that smeared Robert Kennedy and commended the author to us. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #251
No.That's what you said I wrote. Octafish Oct 2013 #254
So what I said you wrote is you commending the author to us? That's where Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #258
No where there did I write what you said, Bolo Boffin. Octafish Oct 2013 #259
You aren't fooling anyone. n/t Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #261
Not my problem. Octafish Oct 2013 #265
America knew the truth the minute Lee Harvey Oswald was arrested. duffyduff Oct 2013 #46
+1000! n-t Logical Oct 2013 #48
Oh no, the grassy knoll people will be freaking out. n-t Logical Oct 2013 #47
50 years later and water is still wet. Rex Oct 2013 #51
Conspiracy theorists are like true religious believers. kiva Oct 2013 #54
The real fervor is from those who have stayed willingly blind through three major "coincidental" villager Oct 2013 #58
And three men who had been opponents of Richard Nixon for the Presidency, Art_from_Ark Oct 2013 #72
Coincidences happen. YoungDemCA Oct 2013 #214
Two times is a coincidence Art_from_Ark Oct 2013 #215
In 1964, when the Warren report was issued, meanit Oct 2013 #70
Nothing wrong with being skeptical BootinUp Oct 2013 #73
Those who want to squelch any inquiry may be understood by remembering a quote from Einstein. AnotherMcIntosh Oct 2013 #78
United States House Select Committee on Assassinations in 1976 concluded it was a likely conspiracy. grahamhgreen Oct 2013 #140
Oh dear. The only problem is that conclusion was all based on a very flawed BootinUp Oct 2013 #184
HSCA came to the correct conclusion in spite of CIA obstruction. MinM Oct 2013 #193
Nope. The Dictabelt recorded a motorcycle two miles away from Dealey Plaza. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #194
Admittedly that was the weakest evidence... MinM Oct 2013 #197
That was the only thing that got them to conclude conspiracy. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #198
MinM, the whole basis for the "conspiracy" was the flawed 4th shot nonsense. BootinUp Oct 2013 #199
Skepticism is not the main goal of conspiracy theorists... Gravitycollapse Oct 2013 #189
I just want a reasonable, coherent explanation for DiverDave Oct 2013 #75
That movie is legendary for its inaccuracies, but sure I know exactly BootinUp Oct 2013 #80
nope, aint no way a ballistic object DiverDave Oct 2013 #171
Your just f'in with me, lol. BootinUp Oct 2013 #182
Easy to fire that fast. The bullet was a full metal jacket bullet, designed to penetrate. GreenStormCloud Oct 2013 #191
How dare they criticize my middle class hobby! The Midway Rebel Oct 2013 #108
Like when the Government swore Iraq had WMDs. Octafish Oct 2013 #149
Wow, a blue link to one of your own posts. The Midway Rebel Oct 2013 #174
Right, like where did you write about lying America into wars for profit? Octafish Oct 2013 #192
Awesome. The Midway Rebel Oct 2013 #202
So, your answer should be: ''I haven't written anything on DU about wars for profit.'' Octafish Oct 2013 #230
I haven't written anything on DU about wars for profit... The Midway Rebel Oct 2013 #277
That was a fairly easily obtained conspiracy. The level of complexity to the JFK assassination... Gravitycollapse Oct 2013 #187
No conspiracy? KamaAina Oct 2013 #112
Fuck that I wouldn't trust the god damn Warren Commission gopiscrap Oct 2013 #150
While there seems to be a few folks interested BootinUp Oct 2013 #204
Mission accomplished. Rex Oct 2013 #207
The responses in this thread prove that conspiratorial thinking is not just for the Right... YoungDemCA Oct 2013 #210
What's amazing is how closed-minded some people are. Octafish Oct 2013 #229
Not amazing, so typical that it is scary. Social engineering seems to work like a charm. Rex Oct 2013 #242
Remember who was elected on a platform to eliminate the Department of Education? Octafish Oct 2013 #246
Amazing. Rex Oct 2013 #248
Remember Steve Kangas? Octafish Oct 2013 #252
I did not know that about Kangas! Rex Oct 2013 #257
Yes, Kangas committed suicide in Scaife's offices. Bolo Boffin Oct 2013 #263
That makes me want to vomit. Some lost soul still trying to sell that POS report. Zen Democrat Oct 2013 #267
Well if you have to, stick your head out the window at least! BootinUp Oct 2013 #270
To the brave 13 who reccd this thread... BootinUp Oct 2013 #271
Nonsense. That anyone can still advance the "official" story as true is laughable. GoneFishin Oct 2013 #276
Why didn't you just post that BootinUp Oct 2013 #278
Because that is not the truth. It's that simple. n/t GoneFishin Nov 2013 #279
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nov. 22, 1963: 50 years, ...»Reply #132