Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Nov. 22, 1963: 50 years, and still no conspiracy|Op Ed LA Times [View all]BootinUp
(49,169 posts)270. Well if you have to, stick your head out the window at least!
As to the rest of your post....well, I can only suggest there is more than enough information in this thread to make reasonable minds question their beliefs. Give it try if you are not afraid to.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
279 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
All they have to do is make sure that every fragment of evidence has been released to the public
JDPriestly
Oct 2013
#76
Yes. In Texas. That's why people are not happy with the conclusions of the Warren Report.
JDPriestly
Oct 2013
#148
I was in college when the assassination occurred. I remember it clearly. I am not happy
JDPriestly
Oct 2013
#77
And the vast majority of those who discount the Warren Report have never actually read it.
stopbush
Oct 2013
#135
Because he has tons of evidence and a humanly possible scenario on his side
Schema Thing
Oct 2013
#8
How did Oswald get in and out of the Soviet Union during the height of the Cold War?
KurtNYC
Oct 2013
#96
what page or section? I find no mention of Ferrie or Ruby in the Oswald bio of WCR.
KurtNYC
Oct 2013
#146
Perhaps you either haven't read or have forgotten how Oswald got into the USSR.
KurtNYC
Oct 2013
#163
"the last person picked by anyone for a high profile operation" unless you need a patsy perhaps.
KurtNYC
Oct 2013
#172
When a target is moving directly away, it is as if the target is standing still.
GreenStormCloud
Oct 2013
#179
Yes. He passed the Marines qualification standards to be a combat rifleman.
GreenStormCloud
Oct 2013
#190
Could be because the nitty gritty of the whole story has been under secrecy wraps since it happened.
shraby
Oct 2013
#6
Heres a decent attempt to explain Warren on Japanese Internment You probably aren't interested
BootinUp
Oct 2013
#23
My wife, a political science major in the early '50s, still vividly recalls one of her professors,
indepat
Oct 2013
#36
We as citizens couldn't handle the truth......its easier to swallow what we are told.... Good god
Gin
Oct 2013
#26
The truth may be that Oswald didn't act alone, but many refuse to consider that.
villager
Oct 2013
#40
Since you credit the HSCA then, I guess -- since you don't cherry pick, right? -- you agree
villager
Oct 2013
#60
Let me turn the question around: Do you believe that all three major 60's assassinations were really
villager
Oct 2013
#66
Too bad that Hale Boggs who was on the Warren Commission and wanted to re-open an investigation
AnotherMcIntosh
Oct 2013
#27
The first odd thing was that the police, FBI, et al immediately knew that (1) Oswald was the shooter
AnotherMcIntosh
Oct 2013
#50
Well he was identified as the only employee who his employer was certain wasn't missing.
grantcart
Oct 2013
#154
Yep, stop looking for anyone else if an employer is reportedly missing one employee. Good call.
AnotherMcIntosh
Oct 2013
#155
Not true. Anyone can see the questions at #50: "How did they know that he was the only one involved?
AnotherMcIntosh
Oct 2013
#158
At #156, you said I "raised the question 'how did the police know it was Oswald so quickly'
AnotherMcIntosh
Oct 2013
#160
So we are clear on this point: There is absolutely nothing unusual or mysterious
grantcart
Oct 2013
#161
What we are clear on is that you create strawmen and falsely attribute statements to others.
AnotherMcIntosh
Oct 2013
#162
I found your post ambiguous and am trying to understand exactly what it is you are alleging.
grantcart
Oct 2013
#164
The birth of conspiracy theories was a huge detriment to the intelligence of American society.
BluegrassStateBlues
Oct 2013
#34
Yeah. It's not like George Herbert Walker Bush wasn't in Dallas on November 22, 1963.
Octafish
Oct 2013
#71
Thanks, but all that makes assumptions and cherry-picks in order to buttress the Warren Commission.
Octafish
Oct 2013
#82
Quit with the Sideshow, Bolo Boffin. When it comes to Dallas, CIA calls up its assets in the media.
Octafish
Oct 2013
#228
So you intend to keep climbing up on that cross, nailing yourself on, and wailing?
Bolo Boffin
Oct 2013
#250
How much time do you have to dedicate yourself to a subthread on an old thread?
Octafish
Oct 2013
#255
Why defend a puke liar, Bolo Boffin? And your question has nothing to do with the subject.
Octafish
Oct 2013
#89
That says RFK is an accessory to his brother's murder. It doesn't get more "smear" than that.
Bolo Boffin
Oct 2013
#110
Not what I wrote, Bolo Boffin. And yet you insist on saying that's what I wrote.
Octafish
Oct 2013
#116
What's sad is you continue to smear me by alleging what I did not write, Bolo Boffin.
Octafish
Oct 2013
#131
You. Posted. That. Article. And. Refuse. To. Disavow. The. RFK. Smear. n/t
Bolo Boffin
Oct 2013
#132
If you're willing to misrepresent what I write, what else do you misrepresent?
Octafish
Oct 2013
#173
I haven't misrepresented you. You posted that link that smeared Bobby Kennedy.
Bolo Boffin
Oct 2013
#176
Why do you want fewer people to learn what happened to President Kennedy, zappaman?
Octafish
Oct 2013
#128
You really do think Robert Kennedy was an accessory after the fact in his brother's murder.
Bolo Boffin
Oct 2013
#196
You bring up things I didn't say and try to make me use my time defending them.
Octafish
Oct 2013
#256
You posted an article that smeared Robert Kennedy and commended the author to us.
Bolo Boffin
Oct 2013
#251
The real fervor is from those who have stayed willingly blind through three major "coincidental"
villager
Oct 2013
#58
Those who want to squelch any inquiry may be understood by remembering a quote from Einstein.
AnotherMcIntosh
Oct 2013
#78
United States House Select Committee on Assassinations in 1976 concluded it was a likely conspiracy.
grahamhgreen
Oct 2013
#140
Nope. The Dictabelt recorded a motorcycle two miles away from Dealey Plaza.
Bolo Boffin
Oct 2013
#194
Easy to fire that fast. The bullet was a full metal jacket bullet, designed to penetrate.
GreenStormCloud
Oct 2013
#191
So, your answer should be: ''I haven't written anything on DU about wars for profit.''
Octafish
Oct 2013
#230
That was a fairly easily obtained conspiracy. The level of complexity to the JFK assassination...
Gravitycollapse
Oct 2013
#187
The responses in this thread prove that conspiratorial thinking is not just for the Right...
YoungDemCA
Oct 2013
#210
Not amazing, so typical that it is scary. Social engineering seems to work like a charm.
Rex
Oct 2013
#242
Remember who was elected on a platform to eliminate the Department of Education?
Octafish
Oct 2013
#246
That makes me want to vomit. Some lost soul still trying to sell that POS report.
Zen Democrat
Oct 2013
#267
Nonsense. That anyone can still advance the "official" story as true is laughable.
GoneFishin
Oct 2013
#276