Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(7,932 posts)

18. No because

Mon Nov 4, 2013, 12:41 PM

Nov 2013

if it came right down to it and it was Rachael vs Rand in a dual, Rand would shit his pants and run away before any weapons were even shown.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, do Rand Paul's "duel" comments constitute stochastic terrorism? [View all] Scuba Nov 2013 OP

he probably saw it in a movie NightWatcher Nov 2013 #1

He would lose. Scuba Nov 2013 #3

Well, he is "board certified". Scuba Nov 2013 #12

No, but they sure do make him look like a "tetchy idiot" cali Nov 2013 #5

He had to throw out a duel because he knew Maddow giftedgirl77 Nov 2013 #7

Or a fist fight. Scuba Nov 2013 #8

Of course but a debate would be more fun to watch. giftedgirl77 Nov 2013 #13

Rand Paul is not "just" a moron pscot Nov 2013 #10

Rank Paul has his and wants to prevent others from "getting theirs" rustydog Nov 2013 #11

LOL..."If dueling were legal?" Blue_Tires Nov 2013 #14

He's the kind of guy who reads Andrew Jackson wistfully Prism Nov 2013 #15

he's just such an anachronism.... magical thyme Nov 2013 #17

No because Drale Nov 2013 #18

He's obviously 2naSalit Nov 2013 #19