Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: With all the anti-pornography talk, can we have a sex positive thread? [View all]Kurska
(5,739 posts)20. Rape is completely unacceptable, but so is censorship.
I would ask myself this. Would I prefer to live in a society where consenting adults did some pretty messed up stuff or would I rather live in a society where other people had the ability to police people's private behaviors?
I know what I would pick.
The best way to protect the innocent is to punish rapists. By removing the taboos about sexuality, women become more free to talk about their sexual feelings, including how intolerable they find rape. If we close our society back up and start censoring, I feel that we will do more damage than good.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
588 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

With all the anti-pornography talk, can we have a sex positive thread? [View all]
Kurska
Nov 2013
OP
There is nothing wrong with having mixed feelings about something like rape porn.
Kurska
Nov 2013
#14
porn stops rape? then we should feed our rapist porn to stop them from raping? and they
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#130
The fact that you (or I) don't like it isn't enough to call it harmful.
lumberjack_jeff
Nov 2013
#136
"Your argument is this: porn causes rape and therefore should be banned." ONE post.
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#146
i am gonna have to think how to stream line it in under ten words or less. lol
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#158
btw. out of the 6, you are the first to ask without doubling down on a false accusation
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#159
One problem is there seems to be a conflation of "rape porn" with "all porn" which is not
nomorenomore08
Nov 2013
#361
across the nation reports of downgrading and not filing reports of rape is a huge part of the
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#157
another point. date rapes. in the 70's we did not even know what date rape was.
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#166
huh? are you gonna go after me cause i decided to add something in this subthread? really?
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#184
passive aggressive.... lol. ah ha. woman. check out your posts. that would be passive aggressive
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#195
because we have a net saying 45-75% of claims are false, intimidating reporting. and cops the
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#188
The NCVS isn't about crime *reporting*, it's about perceived victimization.
lumberjack_jeff
Nov 2013
#198
and here would be the flaws in ncvs. and this is without much work looking for issues
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#202
40 yrs ago we did not even consider date rape. 40 yrs ago there was no awareness
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#227
So you're saying that 40 years ago NCVS underestimated even more than it does today?
lumberjack_jeff
Nov 2013
#232
i am saying, what you are proposing is we are about at a zero rape rate, per your numbers.
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#234
three women standing on the porch. i ask, how many rapes. THREE rapes with one
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#190
wrong. and that is why i KNOW your ncvs is flawed. and sure enough. easy to find. nt
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#204
You're absolutely right that even "relatively lower" is still too high.
nomorenomore08
Nov 2013
#371
for argument's sake, let's go way, way out on the uncomfortable logical limb.
lumberjack_jeff
Nov 2013
#193
2006. 8 yrs ago. when internet porn was really getting going. when studies to see that actual
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#199
There are feminists who believe that almost all coitus is coercive and violent
Major Nikon
Nov 2013
#510
Here's where she is getting that totally rather, er... hard to believe figure:
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#522
There's way too much "violence and aggressiveness" in porn. I don't think many people would
nomorenomore08
Nov 2013
#363
Yeah, how dare someone be ambivalent about wank-off material that realistically depicts
nomorenomore08
Nov 2013
#365
hence why I think both child and beastality pronography should be outlawed.
deafskeptic
Nov 2013
#508
Those who produce consensual "simulations" need to more clearly differentiate their product
nomorenomore08
Nov 2013
#353
The question isnt whether there is nasty negative stuff out there, for sure there is.
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#18
I'm perfectly happy to admit that I've seen some porn in my lifetime.
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#29
When folks are continually incapable of arguing against CONSENTING ADULT behavior without
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#5
I think there is a small but vocal minority on DU that are using the cover of Feminism to promote
Katashi_itto
Nov 2013
#36
Precisely. It's not that women don't participate in their own repression - sure they do -
nomorenomore08
Nov 2013
#564
Seriously? Are you really blaming hatred of, and violence against, women on "pseudo-feminists"?
nomorenomore08
Nov 2013
#562
But it seems like you're almost - not quite, but almost - blaming women themselves for abuse.
nomorenomore08
Nov 2013
#575
Sure, I get that. It's kind of a built-in hazard of Internet communication.
nomorenomore08
Nov 2013
#582
Or maybe it's because people aren't listening to them at home and their daily lives. nt
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Nov 2013
#208
not a single pm. it is the stupidest damn OP yet ont he subject. oh... lets all talk about sex
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#51
Right, that would be obsessive. Like setting up an off-site board to coordinate with banned members
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#331
Yeah, I don't ever seem to get bored these days. I always have way more projects I'd like to
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#355
Someone once said that "Character is what you do when you think no one is looking"
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#528
People shouldn't extrapolate from the American porn industry to porn in general.
redgreenandblue
Nov 2013
#12
"all sex is rape" ONE post where anyone on du has said "all sex is rape". ONE. just ONE.
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#46
Alice Schwarzer: "heterosexual sex involves inevitable subjugation of women"
redgreenandblue
Nov 2013
#96
well, since that "crowd" is so very very small and i do not even hear them, golly, and certainly not
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#98
I assure you, my post was not intended as a personal attack against you or any other Duer.
redgreenandblue
Nov 2013
#248
Like I said, putting words in your (and others') mouths. I suppose both "sides" do that sort
nomorenomore08
Nov 2013
#405
then you are doing something wrong, once you find your kink, fetish etc then it becomes. wow
loli phabay
Nov 2013
#72
I have been there and done that and I have seen through the illusion
Douglas Carpenter
Nov 2013
#100
you're probably right - i have always had this weird, kinky tendency of associating sex with
Douglas Carpenter
Nov 2013
#141
To each their own. Different people have different ideas (and ideals) RE: "intimacy."
nomorenomore08
Nov 2013
#409
that's a pretty arrogant thing to say. Some mature to a point where they recognize that somethings
Douglas Carpenter
Nov 2013
#534
Quite the contrary. It's called accepting reality - and the more I have
Douglas Carpenter
Nov 2013
#556
Why does it have to be one or the other? Can't you lust for someone intensely and still "cherish"
nomorenomore08
Nov 2013
#411
ANY pornography though is exploitive and rather sleazy. Consensual PRIVATE ADULT sexual behavior is
RBInMaine
Nov 2013
#42
Yes, the government doesn't belong in your bedroom... until you bring a camera? n/t
Kurska
Nov 2013
#179
That's the reducto ad absurdum. But I don't think many people are actually taking the argument
nomorenomore08
Nov 2013
#413
""anti-pornography" vs pro-sex" such rw lutz labeling. like pro life vs pro abortion. ya. that
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#58
and i explained my refusal to allow YOU and other men to define ME as sex negative. no.
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#79
It should be pointed out you have no problem using inflammatory references yourself
Major Nikon
Nov 2013
#84
what is really funny is the people that i hear accuse others of being anti sex are having a hell of
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#50
did not bother with your post. the point of YOU telling ME i have man issues... end of conversation
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#63
it does not matter how you define them. they are used for insult. just.... NO
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#76
what happens in my bedroom, or my streaming or flikr account is no ones business.
loli phabay
Nov 2013
#69
you realise that webcams, streaming, flikr etc are extensions of our bedroom nowadays
loli phabay
Nov 2013
#89
I was thinking of the general landscape of the "industry" and how it kind of bums me out.
nomorenomore08
Nov 2013
#520
I basically agree. Which is why, even though I support it in principle, I suspect the U.K. law
nomorenomore08
Nov 2013
#558
you insist your children watch you and your wife go at it cause you feel it is educational, or
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#81
heres the issue though your line and mine are in different locations, my issue is who draws the line
loli phabay
Nov 2013
#86
when you use comments like " faint of heart", i stop listening. i am not married to any of this.
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#88
no iggo we cannot when the premise of the thread is those people do not like sex.
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#67
I didn't read the body of the OP. I just answered the question in the subject line.
Iggo
Nov 2013
#150
thank you... clarification is our friend. i appreciate it. go back to the trash bin
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#151
when a posts intent is to insult, why would you think the insulted is going to stay quiet?
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#95
sex positive/sex negative. prude.... kinda like pro life. is that offensive to you?
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#101
yes. a man that speaks out for women regularly. is not offended by sex negative, cause
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#110
"Sex positive" as it applies to feminism originated with Betty Dopson, a feminist
Major Nikon
Nov 2013
#121
says who? or is it the right to insult a group of women shaming them thru their sexuality?
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#116
so, you throw out a false, stupid ass accusation at duers on this board and cause i want an example
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#139
actually, he made the point of stating people in this thread.... so i asked who. see how this works
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#171
really? you know this for a fact, or are you once again just throwing out false accusation? the FACT
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#180
clever but dishonest. "Apparently around here there's no such thing as positive sex. "
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#206
i haev never seen a duer that " there's no such thing as positive sex". enlighten me.
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#214
you say some duers say " there's no such thing as positive sex". i have never seen a duer that
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#220
well, you would have to be a little more specific what you are taking but regardless, i would
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#238
HOW CAN YOU CALL YOURSELF A LIBERAL WHILE YOU'RE DEFENDING PUNCHBOWL POOPING?
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#373
You know, I actually think that thing may be more like "Koyaanisqatsi"
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#539
All the same a-holes who accuse you of defending "rape porn" when you defend vanilla porn...
TroglodyteScholar
Nov 2013
#122
Pretty sure non-private consensual behaviors shouldn't be punished either.
Schema Thing
Nov 2013
#197
...sex is the most awful, filthy thing on earth and you should save it for someone you love."
Tierra_y_Libertad
Nov 2013
#129
I would be profoundly surprised if anyone is being required to look for work IN the adult industry
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#543
did the person that "rape" play lack consent, lack control? cause if there was consent and control,
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#194
So, every point of view a woman can possibly hold should be immune from criticism?
lumberjack_jeff
Nov 2013
#228
My lord, no one is saying you don't have a right to be disgusted by whatever you want.
Kurska
Nov 2013
#235
Any prude who wants to enforce their morality on others deserves nothing but
LittleBlue
Nov 2013
#249
This is life and you will be judged, fairly or unfairly, no matter what laws are passed.
LittleBlue
Nov 2013
#288
so your idea of a positive sex thread is insulting women by shaming them their sexuality?
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#222
see, this is the issue. because women talk about rape porn, you tell them they do not like sex.
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#242
When the hell did I say YOU didn't like sex, why do you even assume this OP is directed at you.
Kurska
Nov 2013
#246
My beef is with people who don't like sex and want to be sure no one else enjoys it either.
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#250
after all the rape porn thread you start an OP ... now can we have a sex positive thread.
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#256
you know, i know, everyone on this thread knows who you were addressing. me personally? all the
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#262
The only people I am addressing are those that want to ban others consensual sexual practices.
Kurska
Nov 2013
#267
YOU are using womens sexuality to shame them. that simple. you cannot justify that, or validate
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#269
It is a fact. You are try to weasel your way around it all. It bottom lines to you
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#274
using sex positive to sex negative, using prude, using anti sex then that is exactly what you are
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#286
I don't think even the freaking TARDIS can translate some of what I am reading here
The Straight Story
Nov 2013
#337
the only other way to "spin it" other than ANTI sex, would be ANTI porn. but what the fuck
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#252
really? women against porn are anti sex, not anti porn. to say anti porn is a spin?
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#266
sex positive/sex negative, anti sex, prude. what do you think that is saying about people who speak
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#290
The 'women' thing implies that we are all of the same mind about everything.
Old and In the Way
Nov 2013
#326
The "disagreement about porn" is full of slut shaming, every time it turns up.
LadyHawkAZ
Nov 2013
#307
"The only freaks are those who violate the rights of others"=shaming women for their sexuallity
Kurska
Nov 2013
#241
"The only freaks are those who violate the rights of others" wtf? and we are clear what you are
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#254
That was line from my OP, maybe you would recognize it if you bothered to read it n/t
Kurska
Nov 2013
#257
there you go. right there. intent clear. this thread is to declare that women that spoke out on
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#268
wtf? of course it is not your sexuality being attacked. you are helping to attack other womens
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#284
I'm not sure why Americans are so afraid of sex. I have had both good and bad experiences in my
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2013
#313
The fact that you googled something and then found the thing you were googling, only indicates that
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#466
LOL! Thanks. But seriously, that poster is writing some very disturbing things.
last1standing
Nov 2013
#394
Ah! I see, you have no desire to look for the facts, you just want to attack.
last1standing
Nov 2013
#412
Since you couldn't resist spitting venom we can go back to the same old....
last1standing
Nov 2013
#453
No, you made a deliberate attempt to be hateful when I was trying to discuss issues.
last1standing
Nov 2013
#462
Seriously, thank you for writing that as I agree with some of it and see more as miscommunication.
last1standing
Nov 2013
#517
I have no dog in this fight. I only wanted you to see the kind of remarks your comments
ScreamingMeemie
Nov 2013
#471
I didn't say she was. I said she is comfortable with homophobic researchers and sites.
last1standing
Nov 2013
#422
I am not going to search for this. It is clear you are not going to provide the link which you
hrmjustin
Nov 2013
#425
Here is the one post in HOF in which I linked to sources over the past several days
BainsBane
Nov 2013
#415
That's not a name, nor are you prominent anywhere other than here (if that)
Major Nikon
Nov 2013
#402
"Are there any prominent anti-pornographers who AREN'T sex negative?" Why does it matter
kwassa
Nov 2013
#440
It is off point and it doesn't matter, which is the only rational answer to your query.
kwassa
Nov 2013
#449
You asked her to back up her claim so of course you don't think women are human beings.
last1standing
Nov 2013
#407
Ahh.. "The Germans". IIRC, TV Guide ranked that episode in the top-10 all time.
opiate69
Nov 2013
#503
I don't care what people do in their bedrooms nor do I make a judgment on most porn.
hrmjustin
Nov 2013
#396
There's a documentary about the Brony culture out there that turned up on Logo
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Nov 2013
#544
Is it pornography when loving exhibitionistic couples broadcast live video of their love making?
Kablooie
Nov 2013
#445
"And what was all that shit about Vietnam? What the FUCK, has anything got to do with Vietnam?"
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#541
'05, I wasn't around here yet. But '08, '09, and especially '11 I remember pretty well.
nomorenomore08
Nov 2013
#560
Hell, I wish one of *my* (admittedly very few) threads would get 500 replies. I'm lucky to get 5.
nomorenomore08
Nov 2013
#559
Nothing. Not inherently anyway. Which is why the conflation of the two is rather questionable.
nomorenomore08
Nov 2013
#565
You're the one saying society should influence how a woman feels about her private sexual behaviors.
Kurska
Nov 2013
#573
I find it laughable you think a woman's private, consensual and enjoyable sex becomes exploitative
Kurska
Nov 2013
#576
You're arguing that pornography and the attitudes around gender roles and sexuality it expresses...
Spider Jerusalem
Nov 2013
#578
I'm arguing that blanket statements on whether a woman should feel exploited or not based on the
Kurska
Nov 2013
#581
Except you're moving the goalposts, and arguing a point I didn't make.
Spider Jerusalem
Nov 2013
#583
People fuck. People like cameras. People like watching stuff on screens.
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#572