Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
10. ooh, a PhD in politics
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 11:50 PM
Mar 2012

I have an MA in economics, but really basic math shows that the payroll tax cuts are for the rich.

Just in case you might understand that, here's the breakdown (on page 3) http://www.ctj.org/pdf/taxcompromise2010.pdf

14.1% of the payroll tax cut goes for to the richest 5%
only 12.1% goes to the poorest 40%.

26.7% goes to the richest 10%
only 27.1% goes to the poorest 60%

Yeah, sure, progressive tax cuts. Sure, Obama started with a making work pay tax credit that gave only 51% of its benefits to the top 40% and 28.9% of its benefits to the bottom 40%. But then he abandoned that, shifting to the right with a tax cut twice as large and which gave 73% of its (larger) benefits to the top 40% and only 12.1% to the bottom 40%.

You know what Bush said about HIS tax cuts? (You know, the ones that Obama decided to keep for four years). He also claimed it was progressive "I think when people take a good, hard look at the rate reduction and who benefits and the fact that our plan erases inequities in the tax code, or eases inequities in the tax code; and that the biggest -- the bottom end of the economic ladder receives the biggest percentage cuts, people will come to realize it. "

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The great DU debate, in a...»Reply #10