Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Legal Schnauzer (friend of Gov. Don Siegelman) FINALLY gets noticed by The New York Times [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)4. If not us, Who?
DU and the Internet have helped keep this important story alive. Thank you for remembering Gov. Donald Siegelman and Roger "The Legal Schnauzer" Shuler, Mnemosyne!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Legal Schnauzer (friend of Gov. Don Siegelman) FINALLY gets noticed by The New York Times [View all]
Octafish
Jan 2014
OP
Thanks Octafish. The Siegelman case is a travesty, of justice, but of much, much more than that.
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#11
Great post, Octafish. Thanks, and you are so right. More free press and more sunshine on those who
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#40
Thank you for doing that. His case needs to be kept in the news until the REAL Criminals who
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#12
So what has the current Democratic Administration done to right this wrong?
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#17
I don't think there has ever been a case where corruption was so clear and proven, yet Democrats
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#18
The simple minded among us have decided that all Democrats are good. If you try to tell them
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#19
He is in prison now and as even many Republicans have stated, he DOESN'T BELONG there. There is more
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#21
What do you mean 'did HE not take the money'? No, HE did not profit in any way if that is your
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#25
I guess I dont understand your point. If you are trying to say that Pres Obama has no responsibility
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#22
He should not be pardoned. The conviction should be overturned, tainted as it was. The same WAY TED
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#28
Don Siegelman was not corrupt. Far from it as even former Republican adversies have stated.
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#30
I hope you're laughing at the idea that the Rule of Law will ever be applied to War Criminals in
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#31
It is a great quote. Then the NYT article ends by saying Shuler is his own worst enemy...
Octafish
Jan 2014
#34
I am thinking that the real enemy are those that pretend to be Democrats that will not
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#37
In a way, he has already pardoned, or exonerated or forgiven them. So why the scoffing? Have they
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#42
I understand but when Sen Warren is elected president, she may not be so accommodating.
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#44
UPDATE; Thursday, Jan. 16..."Robert Shuler Was Victim of Gross Police Brutality"
red dog 1
Jan 2014
#39