Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Legal Schnauzer (friend of Gov. Don Siegelman) FINALLY gets noticed by The New York Times [View all]pscot
(21,044 posts)15. K&R this!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Legal Schnauzer (friend of Gov. Don Siegelman) FINALLY gets noticed by The New York Times [View all]
Octafish
Jan 2014
OP
Thanks Octafish. The Siegelman case is a travesty, of justice, but of much, much more than that.
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#11
Great post, Octafish. Thanks, and you are so right. More free press and more sunshine on those who
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#40
Thank you for doing that. His case needs to be kept in the news until the REAL Criminals who
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#12
So what has the current Democratic Administration done to right this wrong?
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#17
I don't think there has ever been a case where corruption was so clear and proven, yet Democrats
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#18
The simple minded among us have decided that all Democrats are good. If you try to tell them
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#19
He is in prison now and as even many Republicans have stated, he DOESN'T BELONG there. There is more
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#21
What do you mean 'did HE not take the money'? No, HE did not profit in any way if that is your
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#25
I guess I dont understand your point. If you are trying to say that Pres Obama has no responsibility
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#22
He should not be pardoned. The conviction should be overturned, tainted as it was. The same WAY TED
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#28
Don Siegelman was not corrupt. Far from it as even former Republican adversies have stated.
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#30
I hope you're laughing at the idea that the Rule of Law will ever be applied to War Criminals in
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#31
It is a great quote. Then the NYT article ends by saying Shuler is his own worst enemy...
Octafish
Jan 2014
#34
I am thinking that the real enemy are those that pretend to be Democrats that will not
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#37
In a way, he has already pardoned, or exonerated or forgiven them. So why the scoffing? Have they
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#42
I understand but when Sen Warren is elected president, she may not be so accommodating.
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#44
UPDATE; Thursday, Jan. 16..."Robert Shuler Was Victim of Gross Police Brutality"
red dog 1
Jan 2014
#39