General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: American State of the Union: A Festival of Lies [View all]questionseverything
(11,099 posts)so I wanted you to see this and hopefully explain it to me how the heck this can happen....did the justice department keep info from the solicitor general or did he knowingly tell a "falsehood" to the sc?
//////////////////
Muhtorovs challenge has its roots in the case rejected by the Supreme Court last year. In deciding to dismiss, the Supreme Court relied upon the assurance by the U.S. solicitor general that the government would notify criminal defendants when it had used evidence from the surveillance.
But the solicitor general at the time did not know that the Justice Department had a policy to conceal such evidence from defendants. He learned of it only after some criminal defendants sought clarification of remarks that Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) made in late 2012 that the government had used evidence from warrantless monitoring in certain cases. The department reversed its policy last year.
/////////////////////////////////////////////
so the solicitor general presented false info to the supreme court????? because he did not know that justice department was (illegally) concealing evidence???
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/terrorism-suspect-challenges-warrantless-surveillance/2014/01/29/fb9cc2ae-88f1-11e3-a5bd-844629433ba3_story.html
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):