Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 50 Reasons We Should Fear the Worst from Fukushima [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)85. The Implications of The Massive Contamination of Japan With Radioactive Cesium
No. People need to learn what they don't get on tee vee. For instance, how it relates to the "no safe dose" idea, details from a guy who does understand the medicine and science:
The Implications of The Massive Contamination of Japan With Radioactive Cesium
Steven Starr
Senior Scientist, Physicians for Social Responsibility
Director, University of Missouri, Clinical Laboratory Science Program
Helen Caldicott Foundation Fukushima Symposium
New York Academy of Medicine, 11 March 2013
EXCERPT...
There is however strong evidence that the ingestion of these levels of so-called low-dose radiation are, in fact, particularly injurious to children. Research done by Dr. Yuri Bandazhevsky, and his colleagues and students, in Belarus during the period 1991 through 1999, correlated whole body radiation levels of 10 to 30 Becquerels per kilogram of whole body weight with abnormal heart rhythms and levels of 50 Becquerels per kilogram of body weight with irreversible damage to the tissues of the heart and other vital organs.
One of the key discoveries made by Bandazhevsky was that Cesium-137 bioconcentrates in the endocrine and heart tissues, as well as the pancreas, kidneys and intestines. This goes completely against one of the primary assumptions used by the ICRP to calculate effective dose as measured by milliseiverts: that Cesium-137 is uniformly distributed in human tissues.
Let me restate that. The current ICRP methodology is to assume that the absorbed dose is uniformly distributed in human tissues. This is, in fact, not the case.
This table, taken from Bandazhevskys Chronic Cs-137 incorporation in childrens organs, compares the radioactivity measured in 13 organs of 6 infants. Very high specific activity, that is, levels of radioactivity, often 10 times higher than in other organs and tissues were found in the pancreas, thyroid, adrenal glands, heart, and intestinal walls.

CONTINUED...
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Fukushima/StevenStarr.html
Sorry, I'm no expert -- just a lowly reporter, relaying something I thought would be of interest.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
135 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

If a dirty bomber terrorist did to America what Fukushima is doing to the planet...
Octafish
Feb 2014
#1
'Chernobyl Was Transparent Compared to Fukushima': Harvey Wasserman on Ongoing Crisis
Octafish
Feb 2014
#7
Hide thread by keyword is your friend. Also, remember all that silly fuss over the
ChisolmTrailDem
Feb 2014
#4
We all know that the World Health Organization is just a tool of the BFEE...nt
SidDithers
Feb 2014
#113
The Implications of The Massive Contamination of Japan With Radioactive Cesium
Octafish
Feb 2014
#85
Here are the geiger counter readings in the Fukushima area and further north. VERY low
stevenleser
Feb 2014
#87
That's the point of a Gish Gallop. Throw so much nonsense out there people dont have the time to
stevenleser
Feb 2014
#69
Well... only to the extent that posting a similar 9/11 conspiracy gallop would be your fault.
FBaggins
Feb 2014
#84
Yeah, a lot of those sources are from woo and conspiracy theory websites.
Vashta Nerada
Feb 2014
#118
Thank you. The One Big Thing... ''US RADIATION PANEL RECOGNIZES: NO SAFE RADIATION DOSE''
Octafish
Feb 2014
#123