Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

G_j

(40,531 posts)
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 09:13 AM Feb 2014

6 Unanswered Questions About Obama's Drone War [View all]

http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2014/02/6-unanswered-questions-obama-drones

—By H.H. Bhojani| Tue Feb. 4, 2014 3:01 AM GMT

On January 23, 2009, President Barack Obama authorized his first drone strike. The attack, launched against a compound in northwestern Pakistan, killed between 7 and 15 people—but missed the Taliban hideout the Central Intelligence Agency thought it was targeting. Over the next five years, the CIA carried out more than 390 known drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia. (The agency carried out 51 drone strikes between 2004 and 2009, during the Bush administration.)

Obama made a brief reference to the drone campaign in last week's State of the Union address, assuring Congress that "I've imposed prudent limits on the use of drones." This wasn't the first time the president had acknowledged the need for a clear drone policy. Last May, Obama remarked at the National Defense University, "This new technology raises profound questions—about who is targeted, and why." Yet the answers the administration has provided to these profound questions and the prudent limits it has put in place remain vague.

Here are six major questions about the US drone program that remain unanswered a decade after the first strike:

1. Who's being targeted?
<snip>

2. What constitutes an "imminent threat"?
<snip>

3. What about signature strikes?
<snip>

4. Does Congress really know what's going on?
<snip>

5. How are civilian casualties avoided—and counted?

The Presidential Policy Guidance states that lethal strikes may be carried out only with "near certainty that non-combatants will not be injured or killed." However, the Obama administration counts all military-age males killed by drones as militants. That explains why official counts of civilian deaths vary widely from independent counts. While in Sen. Feinstein stated last year that annual civilian casualties from drones fall in the "single digits", the Bureau of Investigative Journalism estimates that total civilian casualties since 2004 in Pakistan alone have ranged from 416 to 951.

6. How does the administration justify the targeting of American citizens?
<snip>
49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Recommend. morningfog Feb 2014 #1
Drones + secret extrajudicial kill lists MannyGoldstein Feb 2014 #2
Nothing. Nothing at all. nt Demo_Chris Feb 2014 #13
Answer 5. If a drone kills them, then they are "combatants". GoneFishin Feb 2014 #3
First month without a US drone strike in Pakistan for over two years ProSense Feb 2014 #4
Maybe they just stopped reporting them whatchamacallit Feb 2014 #5
"First month without a US drone strike in Pakistan for over two years" cali Feb 2014 #6
Actually, ProSense Feb 2014 #8
The Drone Unknowns G_j Feb 2014 #11
The BIJ reports aren't from the government. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #12
"The BIJ reports aren't from the government" cali Feb 2014 #14
WTF? ProSense Feb 2014 #15
Yes bobduca Feb 2014 #21
Sorry, I don't click on your links. ProSense Feb 2014 #22
but its a link to your work bobduca Feb 2014 #35
Sorry, no sale. ProSense Feb 2014 #39
You see, the joke is, EVERY link to DU is work-safe for you! n/t bobduca Feb 2014 #40
Clapper and Alexander don't lie, either! Titonwan Feb 2014 #42
So? blackspade Feb 2014 #18
Well, ProSense Feb 2014 #19
I think you have me confused with another poster.... blackspade Feb 2014 #34
Sorry, fixed. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #38
No problem! blackspade Feb 2014 #41
it's point bobduca Feb 2014 #23
Oh, so Titonwan Feb 2014 #30
Well, ProSense Feb 2014 #31
that's great, however G_j Feb 2014 #7
Legitimate questions. Still, the report is a good sign. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #9
Maybe we ran out? eggplant Feb 2014 #10
Ran out of what? Drones or terrorists? No can't be terrorists, they will never run out, A Simple Game Feb 2014 #17
It's like hot dogs and hot dog buns. eggplant Feb 2014 #47
It ends if "We the People" ever take back control of our Country. n/t A Simple Game Feb 2014 #48
Of money. n/t ReRe Feb 2014 #20
Bwahahahaha! There's an endless supply of that. Just cut social services and voila! valerief Feb 2014 #32
Snort! Titonwan Feb 2014 #43
This is terrible policy. blackspade Feb 2014 #16
I thought that was the idea - To create enemies to fight for fun and profit. RC Feb 2014 #24
^^^^this^^^^ L0oniX Feb 2014 #26
x-actly! blackspade Feb 2014 #33
"War is a Racket" Titonwan Feb 2014 #44
Don't forget about JSOC which is under direct control of the POTUS and his mini me. L0oniX Feb 2014 #25
Fomenting more terrorism which we can spend more tax dollars on! bobduca Feb 2014 #27
"How does the administration justify the targeting of American citizens?" Titonwan Feb 2014 #28
Won't somebody please think of the jobs! SHRED Feb 2014 #29
Drones nil desperandum Feb 2014 #36
The drone conceit would seem exactly the "permanent war footing" DirkGently Feb 2014 #37
Well Said. bvar22 Feb 2014 #46
especially when others follow in our steps G_j Feb 2014 #49
Question 7: How many new Al Qaeda recruits are raised after a drone strike? Octafish Feb 2014 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»6 Unanswered Questions Ab...