Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
45. Question 7: How many new Al Qaeda recruits are raised after a drone strike?
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 12:43 PM
Feb 2014

One for each victim or targetted terrorist?

Ten for each victim or targetted terrorist?

One hundred for each victim or targetted terrorist?

The Military Industrial Complex needs more enemies.



George Bush Takes Charge: The Uses of "Counter-Terrorism"

By Christopher Simpson
Covert Action Quarterly 58

A paper trail of declassified documents from the Reagan‑Bush era yields valuable information on how counter‑terrorism provided a powerful mechanism for solidifying Bush's power base and launching a broad range of national security initiatives.

During the Reagan years, George Bush used "crisis management" and "counter‑terrorism" as vehicles for running key parts of the clandestine side of the US government.

Bush proved especially adept at plausible denial. Some measure of his skill in avoiding responsibility can be taken from the fact that even after the Iran‑Contra affair blew the Reagan administration apart, Bush went on to become the "foreign policy president," while CIA Director William Casey, by then conveniently dead, took most of the blame for a number of covert foreign policy debacles that Bush had set in motion.

The trail of National Security Decision Directives (NSDDS) left by the Reagan administration begins to tell the story. True, much remains classified, and still more was never committed to paper in the first place. Even so, the main picture is clear: As vice president, George Bush was at the center of secret wars, political murders, and America's convoluted oil politics in the Middle East.

SNIP...

Reagan and the NSC also used NSDDs to settle conflicts among security agencies over bureaucratic turf and lines of command. It is through that prism that we see the first glimmers of Vice President Bush's role in clandestine operations during the 1980s.

CONTINUED...

http://books.google.com/books?id=YZqRyj_QXf8C&pg=PA75&lpg=PA75&dq=christopher+simpson+The+Uses+of+%E2%80%98Counter-Terrorism%E2%80%99&source=bl&ots=8klB0PzATX&sig=hi9DpE3qF43Oefh7iGn79W4jXQs&hl=en&ei=zAFQTeriBsr2gAfu1Mgc&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=christopher%20simpson%20The%20Uses%20of%20%E2%80%98Counter-Terrorism%E2%80%99&f=false



And some thought it would be hard, after the fall of communism.

PS: Forgot about the peace dividend already, America?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Recommend. morningfog Feb 2014 #1
Drones + secret extrajudicial kill lists MannyGoldstein Feb 2014 #2
Nothing. Nothing at all. nt Demo_Chris Feb 2014 #13
Answer 5. If a drone kills them, then they are "combatants". GoneFishin Feb 2014 #3
First month without a US drone strike in Pakistan for over two years ProSense Feb 2014 #4
Maybe they just stopped reporting them whatchamacallit Feb 2014 #5
"First month without a US drone strike in Pakistan for over two years" cali Feb 2014 #6
Actually, ProSense Feb 2014 #8
The Drone Unknowns G_j Feb 2014 #11
The BIJ reports aren't from the government. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #12
"The BIJ reports aren't from the government" cali Feb 2014 #14
WTF? ProSense Feb 2014 #15
Yes bobduca Feb 2014 #21
Sorry, I don't click on your links. ProSense Feb 2014 #22
but its a link to your work bobduca Feb 2014 #35
Sorry, no sale. ProSense Feb 2014 #39
You see, the joke is, EVERY link to DU is work-safe for you! n/t bobduca Feb 2014 #40
Clapper and Alexander don't lie, either! Titonwan Feb 2014 #42
So? blackspade Feb 2014 #18
Well, ProSense Feb 2014 #19
I think you have me confused with another poster.... blackspade Feb 2014 #34
Sorry, fixed. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #38
No problem! blackspade Feb 2014 #41
it's point bobduca Feb 2014 #23
Oh, so Titonwan Feb 2014 #30
Well, ProSense Feb 2014 #31
that's great, however G_j Feb 2014 #7
Legitimate questions. Still, the report is a good sign. n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #9
Maybe we ran out? eggplant Feb 2014 #10
Ran out of what? Drones or terrorists? No can't be terrorists, they will never run out, A Simple Game Feb 2014 #17
It's like hot dogs and hot dog buns. eggplant Feb 2014 #47
It ends if "We the People" ever take back control of our Country. n/t A Simple Game Feb 2014 #48
Of money. n/t ReRe Feb 2014 #20
Bwahahahaha! There's an endless supply of that. Just cut social services and voila! valerief Feb 2014 #32
Snort! Titonwan Feb 2014 #43
This is terrible policy. blackspade Feb 2014 #16
I thought that was the idea - To create enemies to fight for fun and profit. RC Feb 2014 #24
^^^^this^^^^ L0oniX Feb 2014 #26
x-actly! blackspade Feb 2014 #33
"War is a Racket" Titonwan Feb 2014 #44
Don't forget about JSOC which is under direct control of the POTUS and his mini me. L0oniX Feb 2014 #25
Fomenting more terrorism which we can spend more tax dollars on! bobduca Feb 2014 #27
"How does the administration justify the targeting of American citizens?" Titonwan Feb 2014 #28
Won't somebody please think of the jobs! SHRED Feb 2014 #29
Drones nil desperandum Feb 2014 #36
The drone conceit would seem exactly the "permanent war footing" DirkGently Feb 2014 #37
Well Said. bvar22 Feb 2014 #46
especially when others follow in our steps G_j Feb 2014 #49
Question 7: How many new Al Qaeda recruits are raised after a drone strike? Octafish Feb 2014 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»6 Unanswered Questions Ab...»Reply #45