Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 50 Reasons We Should Fear the Worst from Fukushima [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)112. The IAEA seems to be, per The Tokyo Shimbun.
Tokyo Shimbun Article Regarding Confidentiality Clause in the IAEA/FMU Pact, Complete Translation
EXCERPT...
Confidential clause in agreements between IAEA and Fukushima and Fukui Prefectures: shared information could be non-publicized
Complete translation of the December 31, 2013 Tokyo Shimbun article
(Note: This is an unofficial translation, and Tokyo Shimbun is not responsible for the content).
SNIP...
In Fukushima Prefecture, it was the prefectural government that entered into an agreement with IAEA in the area of decontamination and radioactive waste management, whereas Fukushima Medical University entered into an agreement with IAEA in the area of the survey of radiological effect on human health. The memorandum includes detailed "Practical Agreements" which contained a clause stating, "The Parties will ensure the confidentiality of information classified by the other Party as restricted or confidential."
Fukui Prefecture also entered into an agreement with IAEA in the area of development of human resources in the field of nuclear energy, and its memorandum also included a confidentiality clause.
Neither prefecture admits to any information having been classified confidential at this time, but if either the prefectures or IAEA decide to classify information for "they contribute to worsening of the residents' anxiety," there is a possibility that such information as the accident information, as well as radiation measurement data and thyroid cancer information may not be publicized.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs official who was involved in the making of the memorandum stated, upon interview, that "As this is an international agreement, I cannot reveal which party, Japan or IAEA, asked for the confidentiality clause."
SNIP...
Ruiko Mutoh, representative of The Complainants for Criminal Prosecution of the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster, expressed her concern that "IAEA has a history of hiding information about health effects in Chernobyl. The same thing could happen to Fukushima."
SOURCE: http://fukushimavoice-eng2.blogspot.com/2014/01/tokyo-shimbun-article-regarding.html
EXCERPT...
Confidential clause in agreements between IAEA and Fukushima and Fukui Prefectures: shared information could be non-publicized
Complete translation of the December 31, 2013 Tokyo Shimbun article
(Note: This is an unofficial translation, and Tokyo Shimbun is not responsible for the content).
SNIP...
In Fukushima Prefecture, it was the prefectural government that entered into an agreement with IAEA in the area of decontamination and radioactive waste management, whereas Fukushima Medical University entered into an agreement with IAEA in the area of the survey of radiological effect on human health. The memorandum includes detailed "Practical Agreements" which contained a clause stating, "The Parties will ensure the confidentiality of information classified by the other Party as restricted or confidential."
Fukui Prefecture also entered into an agreement with IAEA in the area of development of human resources in the field of nuclear energy, and its memorandum also included a confidentiality clause.
Neither prefecture admits to any information having been classified confidential at this time, but if either the prefectures or IAEA decide to classify information for "they contribute to worsening of the residents' anxiety," there is a possibility that such information as the accident information, as well as radiation measurement data and thyroid cancer information may not be publicized.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs official who was involved in the making of the memorandum stated, upon interview, that "As this is an international agreement, I cannot reveal which party, Japan or IAEA, asked for the confidentiality clause."
SNIP...
Ruiko Mutoh, representative of The Complainants for Criminal Prosecution of the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster, expressed her concern that "IAEA has a history of hiding information about health effects in Chernobyl. The same thing could happen to Fukushima."
SOURCE: http://fukushimavoice-eng2.blogspot.com/2014/01/tokyo-shimbun-article-regarding.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
135 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

If a dirty bomber terrorist did to America what Fukushima is doing to the planet...
Octafish
Feb 2014
#1
'Chernobyl Was Transparent Compared to Fukushima': Harvey Wasserman on Ongoing Crisis
Octafish
Feb 2014
#7
Hide thread by keyword is your friend. Also, remember all that silly fuss over the
ChisolmTrailDem
Feb 2014
#4
We all know that the World Health Organization is just a tool of the BFEE...nt
SidDithers
Feb 2014
#113
The Implications of The Massive Contamination of Japan With Radioactive Cesium
Octafish
Feb 2014
#85
Here are the geiger counter readings in the Fukushima area and further north. VERY low
stevenleser
Feb 2014
#87
That's the point of a Gish Gallop. Throw so much nonsense out there people dont have the time to
stevenleser
Feb 2014
#69
Well... only to the extent that posting a similar 9/11 conspiracy gallop would be your fault.
FBaggins
Feb 2014
#84
Yeah, a lot of those sources are from woo and conspiracy theory websites.
Vashta Nerada
Feb 2014
#118
Thank you. The One Big Thing... ''US RADIATION PANEL RECOGNIZES: NO SAFE RADIATION DOSE''
Octafish
Feb 2014
#123