Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

pampango

(24,692 posts)

3. Some did, but income equality was better (not good) in 1930 than it was in 1928.

Reply to RC (Reply #2)

Wed Feb 26, 2014, 10:53 AM

Feb 2014

Before the Crash, income inequality was at record levels that we have not matched since.

This increased income equality resulting from the Crash was not achieved by lifting up the poor but by watching the rich implode with the collapse of the stock market and banking sector.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Us vs. them [View all] Uben Feb 2014 OP

"Even an idiot can realize this is not sustainable." So true. The same principle pampango Feb 2014 #1

Well off people got rich off the crash and depression of 1929. RC Feb 2014 #2

Some did, but income equality was better (not good) in 1930 than it was in 1928. pampango Feb 2014 #3