Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: *ahem* [View all]rurallib
(62,491 posts)53. coming back to when I am not tired. This is astounding
and much needed infor.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
FABUOUS!!!!! I wondered how Maine ultimately beat Nestle into leaving!!!!!
magical thyme
Feb 2014
#25
See My Post #20. LA is on the way to banning fracking in Los Angeles. Hooray!
JDPriestly
Feb 2014
#21
Do you live in a state where the Governor is not elected by the people of the state?
Cheese4TheRat
Feb 2014
#42
It's not like we need water for more important uses, like drinking, growing food, or putting out
tclambert
Feb 2014
#50
97 billion gallons of water is 7/10ths of 1% of the annual water consumption in CA.
Gravitycollapse
Feb 2014
#54
so it's okay with you to permanently destroy our water, even in the supposedly small amounts
niyad
Feb 2014
#63
It's not a "supposedly" small amount. It is a small amount by any relevant measure.
Gravitycollapse
Mar 2014
#66
so you have no problem with the fact that the supposedly (since the figures come from industry,
niyad
Mar 2014
#73
several weeks ago in the sunday denver post, there was an "article" (which read more like an
niyad
Feb 2014
#55