Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Obama Recently Ordered Military Action. And We Won. You Never Heard About it, Did You? [View all]
http://bluntandcranky.wordpress.com/2014/03/24/obama-recently-ordered-military-action-and-we-won-you-never-heard-about-it-did-you/"Yes, that weak, indecisive, mom-jeans-wearing President of ours just ordered a military strike against Middle-Eastern terrorists. They kicked some Libyan Rebel butt. And the news media kinda sort reported on it. Here is the story: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/18/world/middleeast/libya-oil-tanker.html?_r=0
Youll notice this went down a week or so ago, when the airwaves were filled with Foxish, Rushish, Rightish bashing-on-the-wimpy-black-Prexy noise; small wonder that this story got minimal coverage. But contrary to the prevailing wisdom, our Prexy saw a threat to Libyas democratically-elected government and ordered a military strike to save said government. Oh, and that is the same Libyan government that Republicans accuse Obama of being such a little nancy-boy about (hint: Benghazi).
So why didnt you hear about this? A simple reason: the news media is largely controlled by people who hates them some Obama: http://www.businessinsider.com/these-6-corporations-control-90-of-the-media-in-america-2012-6 So, if you heard about this at all, it was a few plaudits to to the SEALS who carried out the attack. In fact, they deserved a lot more and better coverage, as did the rest of the command and control apparatus. And yes, that includes the President, no matter what that great military expert Sarah Palin may have to say about it.
As noted before on this blog, the infotainment machine wouldnt know real news if it bit them on the ass: http://wp.me/p2jksg-2kb And this is but another example of that phenomenon. If youre relying on less than, say, ten or more news sources, you are getting the Mushroom Treatment.
This writer mistrusts the corporate media, so he listens to it, and then checks a load of other sources, including foreign media outlets, and even some of the fringe whacko sites here in the USA. Nothing goes onto this blog without being subjected to the crankiest of analyses: its a pity that, say, Fox News cant take the time to do the same.
So, please, Gentle Reader, take a few minutes and stroll around the InterTubes, to see what is going on. That is to say, what ELSE is going on that the bean-counters and Raging Righties in their Tightie Whities dont want you to know. Todays example: despite the lies that are being spewed, President Obama is capable of ordering swift, decisive military action (like he also did when he caught Bin Laden).
Good one, Mr. President. Way to give the terrorist scumbuckets one in the eye. Even if (or especially if) hardly anyone gives you credit for it."
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Obama Recently Ordered Military Action. And We Won. You Never Heard About it, Did You? [View all]
riqster
Mar 2014
OP
Bragging about the President bombing human beings doesn't endear me to him [n/t]
Maedhros
Mar 2014
#2
Jingoist crap like "They kicked some Libyan Rebel butt." doesn't fly with me. [n/t]
Maedhros
Mar 2014
#6
Why are you lying about what was in the story? Just flat out, make a dishonest statement? n t
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#14
Translation: "I didn't read the article, but still want to blame Obama and criticize DUers for
FSogol
Mar 2014
#15
give it a couple days and President Obama will be fast-lining onto the deck of the ship..
frylock
Mar 2014
#22
S'truth. And buttressing a government we helped to create, that relies on oil revenue.
riqster
Mar 2014
#24
Being an aging cynic, I would guess this is about preserving the petro-dollar.
snappyturtle
Mar 2014
#29