Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sorry, but I don't buy the "But we couldn't have gotten single-payer" defense [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)124. So Bernie Sanders is a liar?
Senator Sanders said there were 8-10 votes for single payer in the Senate.
You are claiming he was lying.
ME: We passed the ACA without a single GOP vote.
THEM: But red state dems would have been turned out.
THEM: But red state dems would have been turned out.
No, the red state senators would have voted against single-payer. Losing 10-90 does not get us single payer.
THEM: So we have to keep working for single-payer!
ME: How? The dems in red states were turned out. We lost the House and haven't realized enough success with the ACA to adequately guard against losing the Senate.
ME: How? The dems in red states were turned out. We lost the House and haven't realized enough success with the ACA to adequately guard against losing the Senate.
Because the ACA moves the battle for single payer to the states. The next step is to get single payer in blue states. We already won VT. We need to be working on CA and NY and the rest.
Either directly to single payer or via a public option. With no need to profit, a public option should be cheaper than private insurance, which should result in people signing up for it. When they don't die, that means a larger risk pool, which means even lower costs and even more sign ups. You end up with de-facto single payer.
Once we have those examples of single payer working well, that will destroy the FUD the Republicans are spreading about it. Which then lets us return to the national battle in a much stronger position.
1. All we got for being active in 2009 and 2010 was an abomination of a law that has pissed off more people than it has helped. Has it helped people? Yes, but that doesn't nullify the fact that more people are angry than happy
Excellent work regurgitating Republican spin. Actual polling doesn't agree with you.
4. We can't campaign on improving the law because that reinforces the GOP talking point that the law is broken
This is an extremely dumb argument.
Social Security was much smaller in the 1930s. Medicare has been expanded several times. According to you, both of those could not happen.
5. The President continually suspends entire sections of the law including the individual mandate for 2 years
This is false. The mandate was always scheduled to kick in in 2014.
What did we win? We are further behind than when we started because the entire effort was half-assed corporatist kowtowing from the start.
We won single payer.
It's going to take some time, but the ACA is the mechanism through which we get there. The state-based system means we fight in the blue states, where we are much more likely to win. Once we've won there, we are in a stronger position to expand to purple states. Once we've won there, we can return to the national battle in a much better position.
Your alternative is we lose 10-90. Pressure from Obama and voters? Ok, now we lose 25-75. And health care reform is ignored for the next 20 years, just like 1993.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
160 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Sorry, but I don't buy the "But we couldn't have gotten single-payer" defense [View all]
Nuclear Unicorn
Mar 2014
OP
Maybe but I do believe they could have got a Medicare buy in if they had tried, they didn't
ebbie15644
Mar 2014
#91
Too many conservative Dems remain in the party to push for any meaningful progressive reform. nt
NorthCarolina
Mar 2014
#134
At least three of the people I love most in this world have "pre-existing" conditions, so ...
dawg
Mar 2014
#3
Is it just a sad coincidence that insurance has jacked-up the cost of healthcare to the point
Nuclear Unicorn
Mar 2014
#9
Sadly, I have resigned myself to the fact that the corporatists are in power and aren't letting go.
dawg
Mar 2014
#17
I think the President was well intentioned, but I also think he has bought into much of the ...
dawg
Mar 2014
#22
How can we have Single Payer, when they throw people in jail for advocating for the Public Option?
RC
Mar 2014
#6
It was not advocating for single payer, but repeatedly disrupting a Senate hearing
karynnj
Mar 2014
#57
There was NO entitlement for them to have speaking time at a committee hearing
karynnj
Mar 2014
#150
Medicare and Medicaid are in fact single payer. The VA is pure Socialized Medicine.
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2014
#27
It's pretty simple. Conservative Dems wouldn't have voted for single payer. End of argument.
DanTex
Mar 2014
#16
Let's test your argument more directly. I'll spot you every bluedog Senator ...
JoePhilly
Mar 2014
#19
Well ... but we did have total control of the House and Senate for 2 years ... damn it!!
JoePhilly
Mar 2014
#74
Rahm's argument was not that we should strive for something worth the backlash but that
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2014
#31
How does that relate to my point that the OP is not making the same argument as Rahm?
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2014
#37
Okay, I'm wrong. This is the besest healthcare policy EVAH! and only a fool would argue against it!
Nuclear Unicorn
Mar 2014
#58
What's something more progressive that would have kept enough D votes to pass?
Recursion
Mar 2014
#52
My point is about the feasbility of Single Payer. How do you get from Point A to Point Z?
CJCRANE
Mar 2014
#50
21 States have refused to consider Medicaid expansion. 27 have expanded it.
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2014
#49
I too would have liked to see the single payer option, it did not happen, they passed the GOP option
Thinkingabout
Mar 2014
#42
Single Payer was not possible as many Democratic Senators were philosophically against it
karynnj
Mar 2014
#47
Strange that with a Dem WH, House, Senate, we got a Republican health insurance plan
Doctor_J
Mar 2014
#65
You might try reading instead of a knee-jerk defense of president Reagan/Obama
Doctor_J
Mar 2014
#121
"abomination of a law that has pissed off more people than it has helped" - Bullshit.
NYC Liberal
Mar 2014
#93
If the Dems had really wanted some progress on HC, at the very least Medicare would have begun at 60
Doctor_J
Mar 2014
#123
There was one thing standing in our way, which maybe you've failed to account for:
kenny blankenship
Mar 2014
#127
No way this Congress would have taken on the risk of single payer, I'm not even sure Public Option
Hoyt
Mar 2014
#135
According to your profile, you were not on this site back in the Summer of 2009
truedelphi
Mar 2014
#152