General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Alcoholics Anonymous has a terrible success rate, addiction expert finds [View all]loudsue
(14,087 posts)No. I'm not saying that.
AA works for those who let it work for them. There are many alternatives to AA, and if you research them (not falling for their advertising hype, but find out the real numbers), many of them have success rate numbers that are very similar to AA. Addicts frequently need something to provide stability while their lives tend to spin out of their control. AA provides that, if the addict chooses to work it.
Alcoholism is a disease of addiction. There are some addictions that have a better chance of being beaten than others, but a person usually has to find a solid surface to stand on to beat that addiction. AA provides that as well as any of the other options, and is far more accessible than any other option -- all across the country, in almost every town, there are AA meetings. The success rate, or lack of success rate, is not the "fault" of the AA program, which is what the OP title suggests.
I'm saying that, compared to doing nothing, AA has a huge success rate. Compared to the other options, that are not so readily available or accessible, it has saved many more lives, and their families through AL-ANON.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):