General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Alcoholics Anonymous has a terrible success rate, addiction expert finds [View all]riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)You have real time, real life examples of good DUers that this "woo", akin to homeopathy, has helped.
Yet you want to compare it to "utter nonsense". Its either helped them. Or not. They've either gotten relief, measurable relief, or not.
You made the statement and then put out an implied slam against DUers who've gotten relief as "utter nonsense".
Back it up or retract imo.
Count me in as a skeptic who will try ANYTHING that might work to relieve pain and suffering. And if it proves itself to work, I take it as faith that "peer reviewed science" hasn't yet caught up with WHY it works.
I deal with high performance horses as a career. They can't fake a placebo, anymore than an addict can "fake" relief. It either works or it doesn't. Addicts don't have the luxury of "faking" relief. The treatment either works or it doesn't.
You now have a hundred plus examples of good DUer's telling you this treatment is working. Are they lying? Do you disbelieve them? Your problem squaring their "anecdotes" against 'science" isn't the answer imho.
What needs to happen is for science to examine WHY some of this "woo" works. Because make no mistake, some "woo" works. Just like willow bark (an old wives tale) was refined into aspirin, and snake venom as a paralyzer on damaged horse tendons to relieve pain was refined into botox, its actually MORE scientific to keep an open mind about these things imho than to categorically lump them as "utter nonsense".
YMMV.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):