Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: CIA TORTURE: It Was Worse Than Anyone Knew [View all]grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)35. First, you will agree that rendition = kidnapping, right?
PARLIAMENT of CANADA
PRB 07-48E
Extraordinary Rendition: International Law and the Prohibition of Torture
Laura Barnett
Law and Government Division
Revised 17 July 2008
Disclaimer
Contents
Extraordinary Rendition Defined
Since 11 September 2001, controversy has arisen in the Western world concerning the transfer of detainees from one state to another and the conditions of such transfers. Accusations abound with respect to the harsh interrogation methods used against detainees in some countries, as well as the clandestine nature of some holding centres. As a result, the term extraordinary rendition has become a commonly recognized word in the modern lexicon films have been made, and ongoing debates have taken place in the media, and among politicians and academics. This paper will examine the issue of extraordinary rendition, and attempt to define the term and outline international law prohibitions against it. It will also examine American and Canadian law, highlighting key cases in the United States, Canada and Europe that exemplify how various nations are dealing with the phenomenon in the context of their domestic and international law obligations.
Extraordinary Rendition Defined
States dealing with individuals suspected of terrorist or other criminal activities and that wish to transfer the suspect from one state to another for arrest, detention, or interrogation generally have two broad possibilities available to them: extradition and rendition. Extradition is the technique more commonly used, in which a state surrenders a person within its jurisdiction to another state through a formal legal process outlined in legislation and an extradition treaty.
However, transfers of suspects from one state to another may sometimes take place extrajudicially outside the law. This process is known as rendition and generally implies that transferred suspects have no access to the judicial system of the sending state to challenge their transfer. Since 11 September 2001, particular controversy has arisen over allegations of renditions carried out in order that harsh interrogation techniques (torture) prohibited under the sending countrys laws may be applied to the suspect in another country where the laws are less strict.(1) Such transfers are known as extraordinary renditions.(2)
International Law Prohibitions Against Torture and Extraordinary Rendition
A. Jus Cogens and the Non-Derogable Nature of the Prohibition of Torture
A number of international conventions outline the explicit prohibition of torture, cruel inhuman and degrading treatment, and rendition to torture. Numerous United Nations monitoring bodies have also declared the practice of extraordinary rendition to be a violation of the international law prohibition against torture.(3)
http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/lop/researchpublications/prb0748-e.htm
Change your mind yet, or are you still on the side of torture?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

In my view, prosecuting torture is looking forward. We're all looking forward to it!
grahamhgreen
Apr 2014
#32
Dont you know the rules? You cant ask them if they are for or against any issue. nm
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#85
The link has been provided ... I'm hoping you have an actual retort beyond that ...
brett_jv
Apr 2014
#74
It's time for you to say, "I'm against torture", then we can work as a team to eradicate it:-)
grahamhgreen
Apr 2014
#86
Obama is complicit in that his Justice Department has not punished anyone for torturing
JDPriestly
Apr 2014
#24
Anybody who isn’t sickened by this needs to take very long, very deep look into their souls.”
Bandit
Apr 2014
#9
"Torture should always be prosecuted. Not prosecuting makes one complicit in the torture, right?"
woo me with science
Apr 2014
#8
Looking forward is an ethical travesty, a sham, and a mockery. It's a Travisshamockery!
TheKentuckian
Apr 2014
#12
Nah, let's just preach to other countries about morals while we have torture camps
Corruption Inc
Apr 2014
#13
"CHEENEE knew." Shrub, Rums, all knew. CIA didn't "deceive" anybody, was carrying out policy
UTUSN
Apr 2014
#51
It's sickening to me to know that my country now tortures like it's the norm.
Lint Head
Apr 2014
#15
Torture is a stain on the American fabric that can only be cleansed by prosecuting the torturers.
Scuba
Apr 2014
#17
The longer that fuck is allowed to roam free is the less repercussions he faces.
2banon
Apr 2014
#67
Making a good start on health care for all is really an achievement, and the President
amandabeech
Apr 2014
#45
Never forget that Condesleeza gave the go ahead for this human rights violation.
Dawson Leery
Apr 2014
#53