General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Anyone else find equating pets and animals with humans to be rather strange? [View all]Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)The abstract "save-from-drowning" question is obviously silly and counterfactual - for one thing, I'm a lousy swimmer.
But society genuinely has to make choices like this when it comes to deciding who gets organ transplants and who doesn't, and I think that life expectancy is one of the criteria those decisions should be made on, so in that sense the answer to your question is "yes".
I wouldn't say in as many words "the life of a child is worth more than that of an adult". But given the choice of which one to give the life-saving heart to, all else being equal I'd choose the child, provided it's healthy, and for most practical purposes that's probably indistinguishable from saying "your life is worth more". Worth the same per day-to-come, but likely to involve more days.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):