Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

kpete

(71,997 posts)
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 09:30 AM Apr 2014

George W. Bush Used Top Google Results for All Paintings; Who Will Sue for Copyright Infringement? [View all]

George W. Bush Used Top Google Results for All Paintings; Who Will Sue for Copyright Infringement?
Yes, that’s right. George W. Bush is an appropriation artist.


While many may have assumed that he used his experience in meeting with those world leaders in order to have an accurate representation of what they looked like, the truth is that he just pulled results from Google Image search result for each one. Literally. Some people have gone through and done Google Image searches on each of the subjects he painted, and discovered that the paintings were clearly all based on either the very first result, or very near the top search result.




Yes, that's right. George W. Bush is an appropriation artist.

Many of those images are from Wikipedia, where they're under Creative Commons licensing, but others are clearly covered by copyright. As Animal New York notes, the image of former French President Jacques Chirac comes from a photo of the cover of Chirac's book cover, where the copyright on the photo is actually held by the Associated Press.

http://animalnewyork.com/2014/george-w-bush-took-paintings-google-images/
http://www.truthdig.com/arts_culture/item/george_w_bush_used_top_google_results_for_paintings_copyright_20140410

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
AWOL Bush is compleat Republican Berlum Apr 2014 #1
Meh--let him have his painting. He's not a bad artist, really, and it keeps him TwilightGardener Apr 2014 #2
He's copying photographs . . . brush Apr 2014 #3
bush kpete Apr 2014 #4
So? What's the story? Dawgs Apr 2014 #15
Huh? brush Apr 2014 #31
Pretty simple. Why should anyone care that Bush likes to paint? Dawgs Apr 2014 #39
I agree brush Apr 2014 #40
Exactly. I don't get why Dems are getting so excited about this. Dawgs Apr 2014 #14
I think some are just put-off by the Corp-Media fawning over him. "Isnt he cute". nm rhett o rick Apr 2014 #22
Maybe. The media is obviously trying to rehab the Bush name for Jebster, but TwilightGardener Apr 2014 #25
They are transformative Generic Other Apr 2014 #5
The Chirac and Sirleaf edhopper Apr 2014 #12
No-Class Action Suit. Octafish Apr 2014 #6
It is amusing that the investigators couldn't find the right Karzai photo Ms. Toad Apr 2014 #7
Copying from a photograph is not a copyright violation. NV Whino Apr 2014 #8
Agreed. Xyzse Apr 2014 #9
a cheat, a bad artist, and... Supersedeas Apr 2014 #13
Actually it can be as it is a 'derivative work'. PoliticAverse Apr 2014 #26
Then there's this NV Whino Apr 2014 #27
Somebody has WAAAAAAAAY too much time on their hands LOL snooper2 Apr 2014 #10
And Dubya had an mstinamotorcity2 Apr 2014 #11
that's "nookular" corkhead Apr 2014 #24
OOPS mstinamotorcity2 Apr 2014 #41
It would be a small, but savory, legal accountability nt/ UTUSN Apr 2014 #16
Copying from a photograph or image without permission is legal - until you try to sell it. canoeist52 Apr 2014 #17
Fairey lost his court challenge with the AP over his "HOPE" poster. progressoid Apr 2014 #18
Yeah but Fairey was selling his. dilby Apr 2014 #20
You never know. I bet there are poeple out there willing to buy that crap. progressoid Apr 2014 #21
Painting a photograph, doesn't that fall under "Fair use" clause of copyright law bobduca Apr 2014 #19
why does it remind me of this? corkhead Apr 2014 #23
That's how George Zimmerman does his too. PeteSelman Apr 2014 #28
zimmerman came to my mind, too grasswire Apr 2014 #29
Dubya is as good a painter as he was a world leader... n/t backscatter712 Apr 2014 #30
Hah! Your post tops them all. Agreed! nt brush Apr 2014 #32
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2014 #33
Bush is both stupid and lazy Gothmog Apr 2014 #34
I wonder if that critic had heard about this copyright Sister to TxTowelie Apr 2014 #37
He's incapable of original thought, original vision for his "art." Sister to TxTowelie Apr 2014 #35
Then let's hope he Googled Santorum WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2014 #36
This falls under the doctrine of "parodic fair use" jmowreader Apr 2014 #38
the paintings themselves are ok, but it's just like him and his lack of depth JI7 Apr 2014 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»George W. Bush Used Top G...