Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)

13. I understood that from your previous post, and there is no disputing that, is there?

Reply to Xithras (Reply #12)

Thu May 1, 2014, 12:07 PM

May 2014

My statement to you remains true, however...if the cycle does not change, if there is
no transformation of priorities but to rely on the Pentagon for employment, we never
move away from it. I don't see that as a positive long term objective for us.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Massachusetts Legislature Forks Over $177 Million in STATE TAXES to PENTAGON [View all] Octafish Apr 2014 OP

Hurray for State Taxes going to Warmongers Kick Octafish Apr 2014 #1

K&R woo me with science Apr 2014 #2

Perhaps, one day, local government and schools won't have any money at all. Octafish Apr 2014 #3

You have a problem with Democrats supporting the Pentagon with state taxes, why????? Jefferson23 Apr 2014 #4

Relatively peanuts compared with DoD spending in the Bay State FarCenter Apr 2014 #5

But that is not peanuts for state taxes, we're not to expect better investments than the Pentagon? Jefferson23 Apr 2014 #6

DoD spending in MA is about 14 billion and about 100,000 jobs depend on it. FarCenter Apr 2014 #7

We are talking about adding 177 million in state taxes to the Pentagon. Jefferson23 Apr 2014 #8

You are describing extortion n2doc Apr 2014 #9

I'm anti-military, but the practical realities here are simple. Xithras Apr 2014 #10

Then the cycle will never change. n/t Jefferson23 Apr 2014 #11

The $177 million is still "profitable" for the state. They'd take a bigger hit without it. Xithras May 2014 #12

I understood that from your previous post, and there is no disputing that, is there? Jefferson23 May 2014 #13

I know, and I agree with you on that point. Xithras May 2014 #14

Yes, we are more in agreement than not. Any transformation away from that dependency Jefferson23 May 2014 #15